Difference between revisions of "Talk:Destroyed Manufacturing Centers"
Sarna News
(Suggestion article should be re-done.) |
m (categories?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think this list needs be better defined. Breaking it down between destroyed factories, disabled, and so forth. Many of these factory still exist, should be better defined. Some of these company resumed production of their products. Name of the article is bit..accurate? -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 18:57, 5 November 2009 (UTC) | I think this list needs be better defined. Breaking it down between destroyed factories, disabled, and so forth. Many of these factory still exist, should be better defined. Some of these company resumed production of their products. Name of the article is bit..accurate? -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 18:57, 5 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Perhaps better to use categories to flag destroyed and active, of course then we'd still need to over come ones like [[Mitchell Vehicles]] which have both active and destroyed facilities [[User:Cyc|Cyc]] 19:14, 5 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:14, 5 November 2009
List should be re-organized and renamed
I think this list needs be better defined. Breaking it down between destroyed factories, disabled, and so forth. Many of these factory still exist, should be better defined. Some of these company resumed production of their products. Name of the article is bit..accurate? -- Wrangler 18:57, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Perhaps better to use categories to flag destroyed and active, of course then we'd still need to over come ones like Mitchell Vehicles which have both active and destroyed facilities Cyc 19:14, 5 November 2009 (UTC)