Difference between revisions of "Talk:Head Hunting"

m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
:I agree. Headhunting isn't something that is specific to BattleTech (the article even says as much), and the topic as such doesn't, imho, warrant an article here, as per [[Policy:Notability]]. Or did I miss something? [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 15:22, 4 September 2019 (EDT)
 
:I agree. Headhunting isn't something that is specific to BattleTech (the article even says as much), and the topic as such doesn't, imho, warrant an article here, as per [[Policy:Notability]]. Or did I miss something? [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 15:22, 4 September 2019 (EDT)
 
::I've tried to give some battletech flavor to this article, can you review. Not sure though it is enough to save it.--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 19:39, 13 September 2019 (EDT)
 
::I've tried to give some battletech flavor to this article, can you review. Not sure though it is enough to save it.--[[User:Pserratv|Pserratv]] ([[User talk:Pserratv|talk]]) 19:39, 13 September 2019 (EDT)
 +
:::Still not feeling it with this article, virtually every scrap of BT relevant information could be better served as part of a character article or the start of a battle article.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 07:22, 17 September 2019 (EDT)

Revision as of 07:22, 17 September 2019

Purpose?

I kind of feel that this might be a little pointless as an article. The concept of headhunting is far from unique to BattleTech. It in fact has been a fairly standard military practice for thousands of years. This article does not really reflect that, nor does it really do anything else useful in my opinion.--Dmon (talk) 12:04, 4 September 2019 (EDT)

I agree. Headhunting isn't something that is specific to BattleTech (the article even says as much), and the topic as such doesn't, imho, warrant an article here, as per Policy:Notability. Or did I miss something? Frabby (talk) 15:22, 4 September 2019 (EDT)
I've tried to give some battletech flavor to this article, can you review. Not sure though it is enough to save it.--Pserratv (talk) 19:39, 13 September 2019 (EDT)
Still not feeling it with this article, virtually every scrap of BT relevant information could be better served as part of a character article or the start of a battle article.--Dmon (talk) 07:22, 17 September 2019 (EDT)