Difference between revisions of "Talk:Shrapnel (magazine)"

Line 3: Line 3:
 
:I was going to ask you about that.. I was actually just looking at both files trying to figure out if they are different! I was following the template of the [[BattleTechnology]] article with issue art being next to the issue (looks a bit bare now but will make sense when we have more issues). On the subject of having something upto I agree, I was thinking of cropping the image to just show the title.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 09:32, 30 May 2020 (EDT)
 
:I was going to ask you about that.. I was actually just looking at both files trying to figure out if they are different! I was following the template of the [[BattleTechnology]] article with issue art being next to the issue (looks a bit bare now but will make sense when we have more issues). On the subject of having something upto I agree, I was thinking of cropping the image to just show the title.--[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] ([[User talk:Dmon|talk]]) 09:32, 30 May 2020 (EDT)
 
:::Kevin Coleman is the artist, but the problem is we don't know if he will be continuing to be used. I found the official banner of the magazine, we should use this. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 09:43, 30 May 2020 (EDT)
 
:::Kevin Coleman is the artist, but the problem is we don't know if he will be continuing to be used. I found the official banner of the magazine, we should use this. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] ([[User talk:Wrangler|talk]]) 09:43, 30 May 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Various issues==
 +
I have removed the superfluous "Contents" chapter headers. Beyond that, I have two more major issues with this article as it currently is:
 +
*I don't like how the entire product infobox is repeated for every issue. There is hardly any data in the infobox to begin with, and what little is there is very repetitive. I suggest using the [[BattleTechnology]] article (or any other magazine article we have, really) as a template and simply give the cover under each new issue's chapter header.
 +
*I strongly disagree with treating non-story content as fiction. I agree that there should be article links to individual short stories, but I do not consider pieces like unit digests or in-universe news snippets worthy of having their own article. We're not doing this for the content of any other magazine either, and the resulting articles are stub-level empty. Unless someone can give a really good reaons why we should make individual articles like [["Mother of Resistance" Dead on Vipaava]], I shall delete those articles and put their content into this article. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 06:20, 18 June 2022 (EDT)

Revision as of 06:20, 18 June 2022

Double Cover

I'm idiot. I didn't see the individual cover for issue one. I do think there should be something on top thou. -- Wrangler (talk) 09:25, 30 May 2020 (EDT)

I was going to ask you about that.. I was actually just looking at both files trying to figure out if they are different! I was following the template of the BattleTechnology article with issue art being next to the issue (looks a bit bare now but will make sense when we have more issues). On the subject of having something upto I agree, I was thinking of cropping the image to just show the title.--Dmon (talk) 09:32, 30 May 2020 (EDT)
Kevin Coleman is the artist, but the problem is we don't know if he will be continuing to be used. I found the official banner of the magazine, we should use this. -- Wrangler (talk) 09:43, 30 May 2020 (EDT)

Various issues

I have removed the superfluous "Contents" chapter headers. Beyond that, I have two more major issues with this article as it currently is:

  • I don't like how the entire product infobox is repeated for every issue. There is hardly any data in the infobox to begin with, and what little is there is very repetitive. I suggest using the BattleTechnology article (or any other magazine article we have, really) as a template and simply give the cover under each new issue's chapter header.
  • I strongly disagree with treating non-story content as fiction. I agree that there should be article links to individual short stories, but I do not consider pieces like unit digests or in-universe news snippets worthy of having their own article. We're not doing this for the content of any other magazine either, and the resulting articles are stub-level empty. Unless someone can give a really good reaons why we should make individual articles like "Mother of Resistance" Dead on Vipaava, I shall delete those articles and put their content into this article. Frabby (talk) 06:20, 18 June 2022 (EDT)