Difference between revisions of "Template talk:WikiProject BattleMechs"

 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
#Should project templates all be like this? If so, I could either write a CSS class  for them, or a template to use in the creation of these templates. I know the former is the norm on wikipedia, likely so there is less work for the parser to do. Probably faster too, come to think of it.
 
#Should project templates all be like this? If so, I could either write a CSS class  for them, or a template to use in the creation of these templates. I know the former is the norm on wikipedia, likely so there is less work for the parser to do. Probably faster too, come to think of it.
 
--[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] 21:50, 24 November 2006 (CST)
 
--[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] 21:50, 24 November 2006 (CST)
 +
:Response
 +
:# ?
 +
:# I bow to your superior experience. I don't foresee building too many more of these type templates, but I think you're referring to how many times they may be called upon. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche (admin)]] 22:51, 24 November 2006 (CST)

Revision as of 00:51, 25 November 2006

Reworking:

Project: BattleMechs This article is within the scope of the BattleMechs WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of BattleMechs. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
  • Two things:
  1. Opinion?
  2. Should project templates all be like this? If so, I could either write a CSS class for them, or a template to use in the creation of these templates. I know the former is the norm on wikipedia, likely so there is less work for the parser to do. Probably faster too, come to think of it.

--Xoid 21:50, 24 November 2006 (CST)

Response
  1.  ?
  2. I bow to your superior experience. I don't foresee building too many more of these type templates, but I think you're referring to how many times they may be called upon. --Revanche (admin) 22:51, 24 November 2006 (CST)