User talk:Doneve

Welcome

Welcome, Doneve, to BattleTechWiki!

We look forward to your contributions and want to help you get off to a good strong start. Hopefully you will soon join the army of BattleTech Editors! If you need help formatting the pages, visit the manual of style. For general questions go to the Help section or the FAQ. If you can't find your answer there, please ask an Admin.

---

Additional tips
Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the wiki:

• For policies and guidelines, see The Five Core Policies of BattleTechWiki and the BTW Policies. Another good place to check out is our market of Projects, to see how the smaller communities within BTW do things in their particular niche areas.
• Each and every page (articles, policies, projects, images, etc.) has its very own discussion/talk page, found on the tab line at the top of the page. This is a great place to find out what the community is discussing along that subject and what previous issues have already been solved.
• If you want to play around with your new wiki skills, the Sandbox is for you. Don't worry: you won't break anything. A great resource for printing out is the Wiki Cheat Sheet.
• If you're not registered, then please consider doing so. At the very least, you'll have a UserPage that you own, rather than sharing one with the community.
• Also consider writing something about yourself on your UserPage (marked as "Doneve" at the top of the page, though only do this if you're registered). You'll go from being a 'redshirt' to a 'blueshirt,' with the respect of a more permanent member.
  • This is really helpful for the admins, as it gives your account that touch of "humanity" that assists us in our never-ending battle with spambots.
• For your first few edits on the wiki, please do not add any URLs (which can be an indicator of SPAM).
• Consider introducing yourself on our Discord server.
• In your Preferences, under the edit tab, consider checking Add pages I create to my watchlist and Add pages I edit to my watchlist, so that you can see how your efforts have affected the community. Check back on following visits by clicking on watchlist.
• If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random button in the sidebar, or check out the List of Wanted Pages. Or even go to Special Pages to see what weird stuff is actually tracked by this wiki.
• Please sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the circled button in this image; this will automatically produce your name (or IP address, if you are editing anonymously) and the date.

Again, welcome to Sarna's BattleTechWiki!

*******Be Bold*******

Archived

User talk:Doneve/Archive1
User talk:Doneve/Archive2 April 2010-January 2011
User talk:Doneve/Archive3 January 2011-December 2011
User talk:Doneve/Archive4 January 2012-December 2012

Happy New Year

Hy Doneve,

I'd like to wish you and your family a Happy New Year - I hope that 2013 is a great year for everyone.

If nothing else, TPTB have started it off with Objectives: Periphery, which seems like a good start to me BrokenMnemonic (talk) 12:46, 1 January 2013 (PST)

Hy BM, sorry for the late response, i wish you and your family also a Happy New Year.--Doneve (talk) 13:57, 2 January 2013 (PST)

XTRO Primitives Vol 3

Doneve, Just FYI: I undid your formatting changes to the TOC of XTRO Primitives Vol. 3. Battlemechs, Aerospace Fighters, DropShips, Jumpships, Warships are all italicized, but battle armor and combat vehicles aren't. This is how CGL does it and follows the italics policy. --Mbear^(talk) 04:16, 3 January 2013 (PST)

Planet InfoBox

Copied from my talk page Mbear, as the resident expert on infobox construction, is there any way to amend the Template:InfoBoxPlanetStandard template so that if the image is already less than 225 pixels in width, it isn't increased automatically to a width of 225 pixels? Some of the info boxes (like Denbar) are suffering from image bloat because the long, think planetary flags are being scaled up dramatically... BrokenMnemonic (talk) 12:27, 9 January 2013 (PST)

I don't know off the top of my head. Let me look into it.--Mbear^(talk) 04:17, 10 January 2013 (PST)

Updated the InfoboxPlanetStandard to include a new paramater: imagewidth. If you have an image less than 225px, you can enter the width in pixels on this line to show image w/o scaling. Leaving line blank will assume width of 225px.--Mbear^(talk) 04:32, 10 January 2013 (PST)

Excellent, thanks.--Doneve (talk) 08:22, 10 January 2013 (PST)

Skye Rangers Commando

Doneve - So in the back of FM:Lyran Alliance, there's a color pic of a Commando in Skye Ranger colors. Could you upload this one for me? ClanWolverine101 (talk) 10:50, 16 January 2013 (PST)

Done :).--Doneve (talk) 11:50, 16 January 2013 (PST)

Thanks! ClanWolverine101 (talk) 22:14, 16 January 2013 (PST)

Task Force Serpent

Hy Doneve,

Do you know where a list of the WarShips assigned to Task Force Serpent could be found? I notice from the Essex page that several ComStar vessels apparently went, but I've checked all the sourcebooks I can think of and haven't turned anything up. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 12:29, 18 January 2013 (PST)

Ok! i look what i can do for you.--Doneve (talk) 22:12, 19 January 2013 (PST)

Okidoky, the source is Twilight of the Clans sourcebook, p. 8, and on other pages, i hope this helps.--Doneve (talk) 22:21, 19 January 2013 (PST)

Hy, that's great, thank you

Rewritten: 4th Skye Rangers

For your approval, I give you the 4th Skye Rangers. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 21:32, 21 January 2013 (PST)

That's one heck of a re-write. Very sharp looking article. --Rebs (talk) 10:58, 30 January 2013 (PST)

Images

Hello Doneve!

Nic deleted the unused Viper images. :( But that's OK. I dropped him a note and said hello and apologized about cluttering up his database. I explained about the holidays and stuff too. He said it was cool, and to upload the images any time. So... If you are cool with it as well, could you please re-upload Natalie Breen for me? :) (page 91 ER: 3052) I just finished her bio, its a good one. :) And it is also for your approval, or anyone else too. --Rebs (talk) 10:35, 30 January 2013 (PST)

Okidoki, work in progress :).--Doneve (talk) 10:38, 30 January 2013 (PST)

Thank you much, as always. More to come. --Rebs (talk) 12:11, 30 January 2013 (PST)

Hello Doneve :) Could you re-upload Perigard Zalman from pages 92 of ER: 3052, and page 98 of ER:3062? And while in the second book, possibly Steel Viper Alpha Galaxy, Beta Galaxy and Gamma Galaxy insignia from page 63 and 64 of ER:3062. I'll put them with their respective galaxies right away so they will definitely be used... and I'll use the Alpha galaxy pic in an article that is getting close. I know you are busy, so whenever is cool, I'll keep an eye open.--Rebs (talk) 22:17, 13 February 2013 (PST)

Hy Rebs, i re-upload the pics when iam at home.--Doneve (talk) 07:23, 14 February 2013 (PST)

No problem! The galaxy ones will be good for lots of characters, so I was also wondering if maybe there were color ones available. I'll have to go searching... --Rebs (talk) 22:41, 14 February 2013 (PST)

OK, Zalman is approaching the finished state. And the images for the galaxies were already here. My bad. This will be a good one! Rebs (talk) 23:55, 15 February 2013 (PST)

Individual WarShips

Hi Doneve. Had question for you. Why are you making so many sub-directories for individual ships? There aren't that many ships that have extensive information on them them to warrent their own individual articles. I originally made individual ship category, because there only handful ships that had extensive detail to warrent its down profile. Now there ones for individual ships of each Class, whats going on?-- Wrangler (talk) 18:20, 4 February 2013 (PST)

Please take a look on your talk page.--Doneve (talk)

Doneve, i was looking how you were splitting up the Named vessels into their own files. Category for Point Barrow (Vessel) is listed in the Vigiliant Class category, yet the ship's article says its Robinson Class Transport. Could you double check your linking? -- Wrangler (talk) 12:15, 10 February 2013 (PST)

Fixed, it was an copy and past error, thanks.--Doneve (talk) 12:22, 10 February 2013 (PST)

Hy Doneve, Thanks for helping with the individual ships There are thousands of them tucked away in various books. I'm sorry I'm not helping more at the moment - I'm laid up with a nasty chest infection, and while I'm getting better pretty quickly, I've not had a lot of time to get on with editing because the convention work has been pretty busy this week. I'm hoping that'll change this weekend though!
One thing I thought I should mention is the convention on naming ships, which should in theory be the same here as it is on wikipedia - while a ship's name is always italicized, the prefix denoting the service shouldn't be. It's not something that TPTB are 100% consistent with in their books, but it's something I've been trying to follow here. It makes life a bit frustrating, because italics and wikilinks don't really work, but it's the technically correct way of naming them. So, ships like the Inquisitor should be the SLS Inquisitor, rather than the SLS Inquisitor. Does that make sense?
I've been nosing through Historical: Operation Klondike (I have been catching up on my reading a bit) and it's a little frustrating that so many WarShips are involved in battles, but so few get named. It also makes me wonder when the Clans started renaming WarShips, although I'm not sure there's ever going to be a clear answer on that. It's also got me wondering about the prefixes and where they come from - we use a lot here on Sarna, and I've seen them used over on CGL a lot, particularly all the different ones for the Clans, but I've not found many sources in canon where they actually specify the clan prefixes. The Blake Documents confirmed CIH for Clan Ice Hellion and CJF for Clan Jade Falcon, but Frabby asked me about what prefix the Steel Vipers use, given that ComStar seems to have used CSV (ComStar Vessel?), and I couldn't find anything in canon. Any ideas? BrokenMnemonic (talk) 05:40, 13 February 2013 (PST)

Hy BM, at first good luck for your healing process. I am glad to help a little by the massiv amount of various warships. As second, we italic the full name of a warship like SLS Inquisitor, for the prefixes iam with you, there is no clear canon source, named for the most of the vessels, like some of the other clans, [CIH], and [CJF] is stated in a cannon source, i think a talk to the CBT Forum is the best way to clear this.--Doneve (talk) 10:29, 13 February 2013 (PST)

Individual Vessel infobox

Hi Doneve, in the articles you're creating you apparently copy & paste a template using "infoBoxIndividualSpacegoingVessel". That infobox doesn't exist under that name though, it's a redirect to "Template:InfoBoxIndividualVessel". I admit that this isn't important, but I find it irritating to have articles with a redirected infobox. I'm not asking you to go over all the past articles again, but may I suggest that you use the correct template name for future articles to avoid making use of that redirect.
Thank you. :) Frabby (talk) 09:33, 19 February 2013 (PST)

Hy Frabby, i set up the redirect to the infobox, can you delete one of the infoboxes, then we work only from one infobox, thanks.--Doneve (talk) 10:16, 19 February 2013 (PST)

Contact

Hey Doneve - how can I contact you outside of the wiki? Thanks. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 12:55, 14 February 2013 (PST)

Sent you a PM on that forum. Thanks. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 20:29, 17 February 2013 (PST)

Image Discussion

Hey Doneve! I uploaded Perigard Zalman... I just wanted to know, did I do it right? Was there anything I missed? If everything is a go, I'll put it into use. --Rebs (talk) 11:20, 16 February 2013 (PST)

Thanks for the brush ups on the image files. Nice to know I can take care of that end in the future. --Rebs (talk) 20:12, 16 February 2013 (PST)

Dude, and thank you big-time for the Zalman quote. That one is perfect. :) --Rebs (talk) 16:59, 17 February 2013 (PST)

I think i found more quotes provided on the CCG Cards for your clan bio articles, i have a eye on this ;).--Doneve (talk) 17:04, 17 February 2013 (PST)

Product infobox

I've asked Nic to make a change to a CSS file. (I don't have access to it, otherwise I'd just do it.)--Mbear^(talk) 09:40, 20 February 2013 (PST)

Ok, thanks.--Doneve (talk) 09:57, 20 February 2013 (PST)

WarShip Pages

Hy Doneve,

I'd like to give you this assistance appreciated award as thanks for the way you're tidying up after me as I plow through the new ship articles here on Sarna. I'm not getting much time to edit at home because of the Vidukon work I'm doing, and at work I don't get as much editing time as I'd like, so it can take me a fair while to write the articles, set up the redirects and then edit the WarShip/JumpShip/DropShip variant pages to include all the links. You've been a big help in taking some of that off my hands so I can concentrate on the individual ship articles themselves, and I appreciate that greatly.
So, please accept this award, with my thanks: BrokenMnemonic (talk) 23:52, 25 February 2013 (PST)

Thanks .--Doneve (talk) 06:19, 26 February 2013 (PST)

Combat Vehicle Infobox

Hy Mbear, please can you add a heat sinks row to the combat vehicle infobox, thanks.--Doneve (talk) 11:02, 26 February 2013 (PST)

Done!--Mbear^(talk) 12:46, 26 February 2013 (PST)

Great thanks.--Doneve (talk) 12:48, 26 February 2013 (PST)

Ulric Quote

Doneve - I have no problem with you adding it. My concern is that 1) Ulric didn't say it. and 2) It wasn't originally said in regards to him. WoB scripture is way older than the Clan Invasion. The card simply applied it to him for flavor text. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 06:48, 5 March 2013 (PST)

Objectives: Clans

Hello Doneve, i missed that Mortiorium date. However, its four days from now. Its okay leave what i've done alone since there only few days left? -- Wrangler (talk) 19:11, 10 March 2013 (PDT)

I know know, i hate the moratorium but we must live with this, but i became also a "Wrangler" ;), in the last two years, and you are a good teacher.--Doneve (talk) 19:16, 10 March 2013 (PDT)

I've made Wrangler's changes disappear by copying your changes in place. When the moratorium expires, I'll just hit the "roll back" option in the history of the page and Wrangler's additions will arrive again.--Mbear^(talk) 06:21, 11 March 2013 (PDT)

Beowulf IIC

Hi Doneve, no offense intended when I removed the Beowulf IIC link from the list in the IIC article. I'm just too tired to think straight, it should have been made a link to "Beowulf IIC". It was piped to Beowulf#variants though, which is inherently wrong - IIC designs aren't variants, they are 'Mech designs in their own right and need their own article. Btw, I don't own any of the most recent TROs so I don't know where the Beowulf IIC is from. Frabby (talk) 14:19, 11 March 2013 (PDT)

The Beowulf IIC is from Technical Readout: Prototypes, Wrangler is on work to add the missing designs, then in next time the red link became blue ;).--14:41, 11 March 2013 (PDT)

I'll be getting at the Beowulf IIC tomorrow when i have chance. -- Wrangler (talk) 17:13, 11 March 2013 (PDT)

Great, thanks a lot to add some missing 'Mech, vehicle, etc. articles, we have a lack when i look on some TRO content, good work Wrangler.--Doneve (talk) 17:20, 11 March 2013 (PDT)

Puma Tank & Components of Odin

Hi Doneve, i was editing Odin Manufacturing for the above mentioned Beowulf IIC. I ran into problem with the components. You had a B-Pod launcher called the "Odin" for variant of the Puma Tank. Now, this was strictly a variant which never had any fluff (i know of) which would have included actual brandnames for its components. The Link for the B-Pod launcher you setup ended up going to the Clan Tank named Odin. I did a fix calling it Odin (B-Pod). I don't mean hurt your feelings, but adding components that aren't named isn't good. -- Wrangler (talk) 19:35, 12 March 2013 (PDT)

I know of the problem, some brands are not correct linked and so on, iam in work to change some thinks to clear this, thanks for your support.--Doneve (talk) 20:21, 12 March 2013 (PDT)

Enterprise

Hy Doneve,

I notice I gazumped you with the picture of the Enterprise, but I don't think you should delete the version you uploaded, as I think the article can use both. The picture I uploaded is from the record sheet, and shows just the Enterprise - the picture you uploaded shows the Enterprise on trials with other ships nearby. I think you should add your picture to the Enterprise article as a seperate gallery picture at the bottom, personally. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 01:57, 15 March 2013 (PDT)

Design Quirks

Hy Mbear, is it ok when i add a design quirks section to the variants you added from XTRO: Boondoggles?--Doneve (talk) 11:10, 14 March 2013 (PDT)

Sure. I don't know that we need a section though. maybe just a sentence.--Mbear^(talk) 05:48, 15 March 2013 (PDT)

ProtoMech Infobox

Hy, can you add a comsys and T&T row to the infobox, thanks.--Doneve (talk) 09:51, 7 March 2013 (PST)

done.--Mbear^(talk) 05:54, 15 March 2013 (PDT)

Thanks!--Doneve (talk) 07:41, 15 March 2013 (PDT)

Ares Conventions

So, is there any actual reason other than gut feeling why you tossed out my summaries of the appendices together with the articles and called me a plagiarist? Dirk Bastion (talk) 12:55, 17 March 2013 (PDT)

By best will, the content i removed was word for word from Era Digest: Age of War, p. 14-15 and was plagiarized, i don't know if you added the content or another editor, but its a copyright violation, sorry.--Doneve (talk) 17:48, 17 March 2013 (PDT)

Then you didn't actually look beyond one or two paragraphs: the appendices and addendums were pretty obviously summaries and not copies. I will restore them later today. The articles (which I didn't touch at all previously) I'll re-insert as small summaries as well. Next time please just don't lob off parts of an article on a serious accusation of plagiarism without tossing the author a note or at least put one on the article discussion page. Dirk Bastion (talk) 05:14, 18 March 2013 (PDT)

"ClanJadeFalcon"

Thanks for taking action so quickly and clearing this mess up! Frabby (talk) 00:13, 28 March 2013 (PDT)

Thanks for the award! It was child vandalism, i keep my eyes open.--Doneve (talk) 07:58, 28 March 2013 (PDT)

Record Sheets 3075

Tnx for you message. I discover to late that the moratorium for the RS 3075 is not over. I changed the article to their prevoius versions. Neuling (talk) 13:50, 30 March 2013 (PDT)

No problem dude, i hope we have you back with more edits, i know we had a harsh discussion etc. in the past, but no doubt, also some edits from you also welcome.--Doneve (talk) 13:54, 30 March 2013 (PDT)

I find a solution to create my projects on other places and hopefully I can fix minor issues on sarna in the near future. With best regards Neuling (talk) 13:56, 30 March 2013 (PDT)

I know the places and follow the projects, and you do a really great work. With best regards.--Doneve (talk) 14:00, 30 March 2013 (PDT)

Umbra

Hello Doneve, I used a new way to create the Umbra article. Please tell me if my text is good enough, because I use a spell checker to correct my typo. With best regards. Neuling (talk) 12:03, 31 March 2013 (PDT)

The article looks good, i added some links, and fix a typo, good work.--Doneve (talk) 12:06, 31 March 2013 (PDT)

Deep Periphery Map

Hello Doneve, I try to create also a map of the Deep Periphery. My new approach is to upload my work and the original editor can decide if he keep is former upload or accept the different version from me. That is the reason that I upload images and create galleries even in the case that the picture is available with some differences. Neuling (talk) 14:59, 31 March 2013 (PDT)

The map creation was from Bad Syntax, i forgot to add a note one the file, fell free to uploade new maps, i and BrokenMnemonic appriciate this to bring the Planet Overhaul project forwart, and great to have you back.--Doneve (talk) 15:16, 31 March 2013 (PDT)

Design Quirks

Hy Mbear, is it ok when i add a design quirks section to the variants you added from XTRO: Boondoggles?--Doneve (talk) 11:10, 14 March 2013 (PDT)

Sure. I don't know that we need a section though. maybe just a sentence.--Mbear^(talk) 05:48, 15 March 2013 (PDT)

I want to create a Design Quirks page, and i need your support, i know you favor a sentence, but i want to list all quirks in a article, can you help me a little bit, to do this, there is a interesting discussion from FedCom Girl to Herb on the BT forum, and i want to bring this idea to sarna.--Doneve (talk) 18:14, 31 March 2013 (PDT)

Well, one place to start might be the Force Specific Rules page, since that's basically what we're talking about. (Force Specific Rules strike me as Design Quirks for units.) There's a general introduction about the Force Specific Rules, and then a section that lists the effects of the various FSRs. Sounds a lot like the Design Quirks page you're looking to create.--Mbear^(talk) 07:01, 1 April 2013 (PDT)

Battle Armor weapons and ammo

Hello Doneve, I had some difficulties to understand that by the Battle Armor weapons the ammunition is not listed by the various designs. Have you a solution for that problem? With best regards Neuling (talk) 01:35, 2 April 2013 (PDT)

At this time i have no solution, the best is you talk to Mbear. Oh and at this point i stard a project to bring up a Design Quirks page, i know its a lot of work on this subject, are you interested to involve in? I figure in the next days some thinks out, from the style of the page and must talk to Herb and FedComGirl, but the best way is you look on Mber's talk page about this discussion.--01:39, 2 April 2013 (PDT)

Design Quirks, part 2

Doneve, do you want me to put Design Quirks into the Infoboxes? Then more game related material wouldn't be in the main article, but with the other game-related material (weapons load, BV, etc.)--Mbear^(talk) 04:22, 3 April 2013 (PDT)

Of course we should probably put this up for community review.--Mbear^(talk) 04:23, 3 April 2013 (PDT)

This is a good idea, do you put it at first to the SomeGuy/sandbox, i want to see what other's say to this idea, how it works!--Doneve (talk) 10:06, 3 April 2013 (PDT)

Hy Doneve, I was looking at some of your quirk listings, and I think you may have a problem with the obsolete quirk. At the moment, you're creating each obsolete entry as a new quirk - Obsolete (3028), Obsolete (3050), etc. So, you're creating lots of quirks that are going to be almost identical. I think you'd be better to just list the Quick as "Obsolete", but add the year as a pipe mask - Obsolete|Obsolete (3028), Obsolete|Obsolete (3050), etc. The Obsolete Quirk always has the same meaning - the equipment is obsolete after a certain date - but dates will change all over the place. What's important is that it has the quirk in the first place - from a mechanics point of view, the quirk doesn't care when the year is, that's for players to worry about. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 13:03, 4 April 2013 (PDT)

Pfff, you are asolutly right, i set up a tag pipe to [Obsolet], thanks for talking to me with this problem.--Doneve (talk) 13:09, 4 April 2013 (PDT)

Question: Couldn't we just list the quirks under that particular variant? Just a thought. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 16:04, 4 April 2013 (PDT)

At the moment i list the quirks in this variant. I wait of Mbear, when he updated the Sandbox/Infobox, think we moved the Design Quirks to the infobox, but i wait for like or not like to do this.--Doneve (talk) 16:16, 4 April 2013 (PDT)

Sorry, had a busy weekend. Have a look at User:Some Guy/Sandbox3 to see the Design Quirks row added to the sample page. ClanWolverine101, AFAIK, Design Quirks apply to every variant of a particular unit. The Sokar will always have Gas Hog for example. If I'm mistaken, let me know.--Mbear^(talk) 06:11, 8 April 2013 (PDT)

To CW, when i take a look in TRO:Proto, p. 73, the Sokar has this design quirks Gas Hog, Poor Workmanship, Improved Targeting/Short Range, Trailer Hitch. As second what we do when we have more variants with quirks, look on the Trebuchet as example.--Doneve (talk) 08:58, 8 April 2013 (PDT)

Era Report: 3145

Hello, i was working on the article for hours while you were doing your filler one. I hope it does not mess you up. -- Wrangler (talk) 12:22, 7 April 2013 (PDT)

No problem, dude.--Doneve (talk) 12:46, 7 April 2013 (PDT)

Design Quirks Sample Page

Doneve, I like what you've done on Design Quirks. The only comment I have is I think you should move the point cost out of the References section and add it to the Game Rules section. That way you don't have to look in two different places for the info, it's all in one paragraph. Maybe something like one of these:

• Atmospheric Flyer

When operating inside the atmospheric envelope of a planet, AeroSpace units with the Atmsopheric Flyer Quirk receive a bonus to control rolls to reflect the exceptionally stable and highly maneuverable nature of the unit.

Applicable to: AeroSpace Fighters, DropShips and Small Craft. Point Cost: 3

• Atmospheric Flyer

When operating inside the atmospheric envelope of a planet, AeroSpace units with the Atmsopheric Flyer Quirk receive a bonus to control rolls to reflect the exceptionally stable and highly maneuverable nature of the unit.

Applicable to: AeroSpace Fighters, DropShips and Small Craft.

Point Cost: 3

(I've removed references and formatting here to show what I mean.)--Mbear^(talk) 06:16, 8 April 2013 (PDT)

Hi Mbear, I'm the guilty party when it comes to the points being in the references for the Quirks. My thinking was that as I'm trying to avoid giving away enough mechanical rules detail to get us into trouble on the IPR front, I maybe didn't need to list the points cost overtly. I'm not actually giving things like the numbers for the bonuses and penalty modifiers to initiative, PSRs, to-hit rolls and the like, so that while readers can get an idea of what the Quirks do, the article doesn't replace actually buying Strategic Ops to learn the specifics. And, if they aren't getting the specifics for the other rules mechanics, it didn't really seem necessary to add the cost for the Quirks as well. I'm happy to change it, but I thought I'd explain my reasoning... I'm a little twitchy because I don't do much on the rules side of the wiki, being more a fluff person, but I used to be a mod on a wiki for Tau players in Warhammer 40K, and Games Workshop were strict to the point of fanatacism about IPR, copyright and trademarks, so I'm used to giving less detail rather than more. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 08:48, 8 April 2013 (PDT)

Yep, BM found the right words, he is the only contributor for the fluff writing, i only created the main body page and make some little works, you know step by step iam working from but with great response, yes he becomes his award, i must stick a nail in the wound sorry BM , thanks a lot to [BM] and [Mbear] for the great supporters to add missing thinks, etc. to sarna.--Doneve (talk) 18:59, 8 April 2013 (PDT)

Just saw your notes about this. OK. It makes sense to me. But I don't think CGL will complain about it.--Mbear^(talk) 06:04, 13 May 2013 (PDT)

Suzaku & KCMC

Hello Doneve. Wanted give you heads up on this article. Your already working on it. 1) PAGENAME things in the Suzaku, automaticly includes article's name so you don't have manually enter the name (unless they don't work anymore.) Replacing them in your copyediting is a waste. 2) KCMC: I know your king of doing Components. However, KCMC was relocated per entry from TRO:P i just wrote up. I've not looked in the FM:3085 see if its included in there as additional source. Objectives: Draconis Combine does not include because it was occupied by WoB. I'm not sure what should be included on newly relocated KCMC page since it doesn't note anything else being built there. The old Objective Raids is bit old. I won't get rid of the old stuff incase someone referring to it as pre-Jihad source. -- Wrangler (talk) 11:14, 11 April 2013 (PDT)

Thanks for the info, i look what i can found in other sources about the Suzaku components and where there built.--Doneve (talk) 11:21, 11 April 2013 (PDT)

Angus Mctavish

Hy Doneve,

Does this article on Angus Mctavish sound like a legitimate character to you? I've got a nasty feeling it's someone adding their personal fanon character to Sarna, particularly as I'd expect the capitalisation of a legitimate Scottish surname to be McTavish, not Mctavish. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 13:16, 14 April 2013 (PDT)

I have the same feeling as you, i datamined my sources when i see your talk on last day, but i found nothing at this time, i think its fanon!--Doneve (talk) 13:19, 14 April 2013 (PDT)

I notice we get more fanon these days than we used to. I wonder what's causing that?

Btw, if you find any more articles that need updating from the Age of War record sheets pack from TRO 3075, can you let me know? I've rather enjoyed adding the new variants for the spacecraft you flagged up yesterday or the day before. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 12:51, 15 April 2013 (PDT)

Which other fanon articles mean you? I added the deletion template to the Angus Mctavish article. Oh and thanks a lot for adding the missing variants from RS:3075UAoW, when i found more i talk to you. Now i work my way from the Cutting Edge RS.--Doneve (talk) 12:59, 15 April 2013 (PDT)

Adler Malthus Pic

Page 12 of The Battle for Twycross - can you upload this for me? :) ClanWolverine101 (talk) 22:31, 15 April 2013 (PDT)

Work in progress. ;).--Doneve (talk) 22:34, 15 April 2013 (PDT)

XTRO:1945

Hi Doneve, I think it would not be a good idea to add the real-world vehicles from XTRO:1945 to BTW! See detailed response on my talk page. Frabby (talk) 03:52, 18 April 2013 (PDT)

CSR Snow Raven

Hy Doneve, I just added an image for the CSR Snow Raven (based on the assumption that it's in the Snow Raven section of Field Report: Clans, and their WarShip fleet only includes the one McKenna) - but I don't recognise the artists signature. As you're the guru of images here, if you recognise which artist it is, could you possibly add his details to the file? Thanks! BrokenMnemonic (talk) 13:17, 23 April 2013 (PDT)

Hy BM, the artist is Chris Lewis, summary template is updated.--Doneve (talk) 13:31, 23 April 2013 (PDT)

Thank you, much appreciated BrokenMnemonic (talk) 13:47, 23 April 2013 (PDT)

Regarding Design Quirks

Doneve - Respectfully - I don't believe its necessary for every 'Mech to have a "Quirk" section that applies to only one particular variant. Its unneeded and burdensome on the article. This is not to say the information isn't valuable - it is. But it would be much better in my opinion to list the quirks in the already-existing variant section. This is just my opinion. Thanks. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 09:45, 30 April 2013 (PDT)

Operation BULLDOG losses

Hy Doneve,
I'm trying to work out which WarShips were lost during Operation Bulldog, particularly the Draconis Combine WarShips, and I'm not having much luck with the sourcebooks. The closest I've found is in the closing section of The Dragon Roars, where it's stated that two Kyushu, one Kirishima and one Tatsumaki were destroyed; Sarna has details recorded against some ships, but no references, so I can't check them. Are you aware of anything that lists the names of the ships that were destroyed? BrokenMnemonic (talk) 05:03, 8 May 2013 (PDT)

XTRO: Succession Wars Vol 1

Good evening Doneve.

I was uploading some pictures to the site and noticed that most of the designs from the abovementioned XTRO are missing from it. I have the pictures, but I wanted to ask if it was allowed for me to post them as the entries for said mechs are already on the site and thought that it may have something to do with legal stuff behind it. When I asked, I was redirected to you as the man who knows the best when it comes to the pictures.

So here I am asking if there's anything wrong with me adding images to the mechs from the XTRO: SW and linking them to the appropriate 'mech pages.

Thank you for your time and answer in advance. Adridos (talk) 12:53, 9 May 2013 (PDT)

Hey

Hey - We miss you! Hope all is well! ClanWolverine101 (talk) 23:35, 21 May 2013 (PDT)

I was also wondering that. Let us know you're OK! --Rebs (talk) 00:36, 22 May 2013 (PDT)