User talk:Ebakunin

• Talk Archive

Thanks for 2010

Hi Ebakunin! We miss you! Your edits to the CCG articles this year were tremendous, so I wanted to give you a Founders Award. We hope to see you back at some point! Nicjansma 05:25, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Ebakunin, nice to see you back after a couple of years, ähm i undo your revison on the 3068 year page, i think this helps Policy:Year Pages.--Doneve (talk) 01:54, 6 June 2015 (PDT)

Infoboxs

Good morning Ebakunin,

Just looking at your edits to the Brendon Corbett article and noticed you removed Siblings, spouse and children from the infobox. Why did you do this? I am aware that brendon is a Clanner, but since it is common place on the wiki for articles to be started by copy pasting another article and then editing to fit, they do not show up unless filled in, So I really can not figure out any reason to remove them.--Dmon (talk) 23:48, 6 July 2019 (EDT)

Restored. --Ebakunin ^{(talk|contribs)} 23:51, 6 July 2019 (EDT)

Thanks, Jumping on it before it could prolifirate. We already have at least two subvariants of the Character infobox floating about one missing spouse and another missing othernames.. The latter can be really annoying when doing BattleTech Video Game characters who all have callsigns!--Dmon (talk) 00:03, 7 July 2019 (EDT)

On a different note...

On a different note... Welcome back, I noticed a few days ago you where about, it has been about a decade since I have seen you around these parts!--Dmon (talk) 00:12, 7 July 2019 (EDT)

--Ebakunin ^{(talk|contribs)} 18:52, 8 July 2019 (EDT)== Tripitz edit == Hi Ebakunin, in your recent cleanup edit on the Tripitz page you removed the "{sic}" part from the bolded initial mentioning of the name. Why? I feel it is important to stress right out of the gate in the article that this "misspelling" is actual canon. In its current form, this information is hidden in a footnote which I feel could be confusing for readers. Frabby (talk) 03:03, 8 July 2019 (EDT)

Hi Frabby. I removed the {sic} because it's not a misspelling "in-universe" but rather an editor misspelling that became canon. However, I'm not terribly invested in the difference. The change has been been reverted. Thanks. --Ebakunin ^{(talk|contribs)} 18:52, 8 July 2019 (EDT)