Karagin
02/25/02 02:09 PM
63.173.170.78
|
Post deleted by Karagin
Karagin
Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
|
Cray
02/25/02 02:10 PM
204.245.128.3
|
Shadowhawk, clearly. It adorned all those early books.
Mike Miller, Materials Engineer
Disclaimer: Anything stated in this post is unofficial and non-canon unless directly quoted from a published book. Random internet musings of a BattleTech writer are not canon.
|
Karagin
02/25/02 02:18 PM
63.173.170.78
|
Post deleted by Karagin
Karagin
Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
|
Karagin
02/25/02 02:22 PM
63.173.170.78
|
Post deleted by Karagin
Karagin
Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
|
Cray
02/25/02 02:35 PM
204.245.128.3
|
Well, which do you want answered: Your question (in the title) or your poll, which is not representative of all the potential candidates.
I mean, the Shadowhawk really exemplified Battletech for me. Then the Warhammer had its moments - that big poster of the golden Warhammer trudging along was up on my wall for years.
Ooo, hey, you had the Warhammer in your list. Didn't see that. Voted for it.
Mike Miller, Materials Engineer
Disclaimer: Anything stated in this post is unofficial and non-canon unless directly quoted from a published book. Random internet musings of a BattleTech writer are not canon.
Edited by Cray (02/25/02 02:36 PM)
|
Karagin
02/25/02 02:37 PM
63.173.170.78
|
YES.
Karagin
Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
|
NathanKell
02/25/02 02:37 PM
24.44.238.62
|
Quite.
For me, it's the Warhammer, especially since I started with 3rd Ed. Though, since it makes far more sense to post one's choice, instead voting in a limited poll, that's what I'm doing.
Second would actually be the Catapult, as it too has that "gritty" feel. Though really all the 3rd ed (the good unseen dozen) are signature, from the Locust to the Battlemaster.
-NathanKell, BT Space Wars
Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear.
Thomas Jefferson |
Cray
02/25/02 02:37 PM
204.245.128.3
|
"Just pick one of the four" and "which mech of the four IS BT to you" is pretty mutually exclusive. I still think the Shadowhawk is a better answer for me, though I went with my second choice (Warhammer).
Mike Miller, Materials Engineer
Disclaimer: Anything stated in this post is unofficial and non-canon unless directly quoted from a published book. Random internet musings of a BattleTech writer are not canon.
|
Karagin
02/25/02 02:41 PM
63.173.170.78
|
Post deleted by Karagin
Karagin
Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
|
KamikazeJohnson
02/25/02 02:43 PM
209.202.47.12
|
Since I never particularly liked any of those 'Mechs (ok, except for the Mad Cat, but I rarely play Clan) I'm reluctant to declare one of those "the" definitive 'Mech of the game. A "none of the above" choice would have been helpful...
Peace is that glorious moment in history when everyone stands around reloading.
--Thomas Jefferson
|
KamikazeJohnson
02/25/02 02:45 PM
209.202.47.12
|
>>WHY ARE ALL OF YOU PICKING APART THE POLE? WHY CAN'T YOU SIMPLE PICK ONE MECH AND BE DONE WITH IT<<
because, apparently, most people want to vote "none of the above"...maybe a repost with that fifth option?
Peace is that glorious moment in history when everyone stands around reloading.
--Thomas Jefferson
|
Cray
02/25/02 02:46 PM
204.245.128.3
|
I'm picking it apart because your poll was rudely presumptuous by not allowing for my views - a simple "none of the above" would've been peachy, or "none of the above, list your choice here" would've been stellar.
Mike Miller, Materials Engineer
Disclaimer: Anything stated in this post is unofficial and non-canon unless directly quoted from a published book. Random internet musings of a BattleTech writer are not canon.
|
Karagin
02/25/02 02:49 PM
63.173.170.78
|
Post deleted by Karagin
Karagin
Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
|
Karagin
02/25/02 02:54 PM
63.173.170.78
|
Post deleted by Karagin
Karagin
Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
|
Cray
02/25/02 02:55 PM
204.245.128.3
|
Well, I didn't really think any of those mechs made the game, so your poll wouldn't work.
Mike Miller, Materials Engineer
Disclaimer: Anything stated in this post is unofficial and non-canon unless directly quoted from a published book. Random internet musings of a BattleTech writer are not canon.
|
Karagin
02/25/02 02:56 PM
63.173.170.78
|
Post deleted by Karagin
Karagin
Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
|
Cray
02/25/02 03:01 PM
204.245.128.3
|
>I am so glad your opinion is the sole of everyone here.
Oops, I did phrase it that way. My bad. I meant, your poll didn't work for me.
Mike Miller, Materials Engineer
Disclaimer: Anything stated in this post is unofficial and non-canon unless directly quoted from a published book. Random internet musings of a BattleTech writer are not canon.
|
NathanKell
02/25/02 03:03 PM
24.44.238.62
|
>I am so glad your [Cray's] opinion is the sole of everyone here.
As am I, because it is.
-NathanKell, BT Space Wars
Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear.
Thomas Jefferson |