Editing Talk:Mercenary Review Board
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision
Your text
Line 3:
Line 3: Frabby, I'm not so sure I agree with removing the category. In my mind, everything 'belongs' to something and this ties in so well with the mercenary 'community.' While its true someone can find it using a search, seeing it within the category might also spark an interest [thinking of how I often find interesting information on Wikipedia]. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 09:01, 8 July 2008 (CDT) Frabby, I'm not so sure I agree with removing the category. In my mind, everything 'belongs' to something and this ties in so well with the mercenary 'community.' While its true someone can find it using a search, seeing it within the category might also spark an interest [thinking of how I often find interesting information on Wikipedia]. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 09:01, 8 July 2008 (CDT) :Originally, the category was named [[Mercenary unit]]s and contained much of what now comprises the article of the same name. That is why I thought it should still only contain Merc units (and the fact that the MRB and MRBC are not Mercenaries themselves). If the category is meant to cover a wider aspect then I agree the MRB and MRBC belong there, and Hiring Hall, but what else? I feel these three articles would be somewhat alien among all the merc units listed otherwise. If the category is to include general stuff that has to do with the merc business then it needs to be renamed imho. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 09:26, 8 July 2008 (CDT) :Originally, the category was named [[Mercenary unit]]s and contained much of what now comprises the article of the same name. That is why I thought it should still only contain Merc units (and the fact that the MRB and MRBC are not Mercenaries themselves). If the category is meant to cover a wider aspect then I agree the MRB and MRBC belong there, and Hiring Hall, but what else? I feel these three articles would be somewhat alien among all the merc units listed otherwise. If the category is to include general stuff that has to do with the merc business then it needs to be renamed imho. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 09:26, 8 July 2008 (CDT) − ::Good points. Can we make Category: Mercenary Units a sub-cat of Category: Mercenary? --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 21:00, 8 July 2008 (CDT)
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Frabby, I'm not so sure I agree with removing the category. In my mind, everything 'belongs' to something and this ties in so well with the mercenary 'community.' While its true someone can find it using a search, seeing it within the category might also spark an interest [thinking of how I often find interesting information on Wikipedia]. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 09:01, 8 July 2008 (CDT) | Frabby, I'm not so sure I agree with removing the category. In my mind, everything 'belongs' to something and this ties in so well with the mercenary 'community.' While its true someone can find it using a search, seeing it within the category might also spark an interest [thinking of how I often find interesting information on Wikipedia]. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 09:01, 8 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
:Originally, the category was named [[Mercenary unit]]s and contained much of what now comprises the article of the same name. That is why I thought it should still only contain Merc units (and the fact that the MRB and MRBC are not Mercenaries themselves). If the category is meant to cover a wider aspect then I agree the MRB and MRBC belong there, and Hiring Hall, but what else? I feel these three articles would be somewhat alien among all the merc units listed otherwise. If the category is to include general stuff that has to do with the merc business then it needs to be renamed imho. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 09:26, 8 July 2008 (CDT) | :Originally, the category was named [[Mercenary unit]]s and contained much of what now comprises the article of the same name. That is why I thought it should still only contain Merc units (and the fact that the MRB and MRBC are not Mercenaries themselves). If the category is meant to cover a wider aspect then I agree the MRB and MRBC belong there, and Hiring Hall, but what else? I feel these three articles would be somewhat alien among all the merc units listed otherwise. If the category is to include general stuff that has to do with the merc business then it needs to be renamed imho. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 09:26, 8 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
| − | |||