Discussion: Edit

Editing BattleTechWiki talk:Project Factions

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
:::This probably doesn't belong on this particular talk page, but fwiw I feel we need to consolidate the Infoboxes and have fewer of them, not more. Probably your #3 proposal, though I'm certainly also agreeable to #2 to a degree.
 
:::This probably doesn't belong on this particular talk page, but fwiw I feel we need to consolidate the Infoboxes and have fewer of them, not more. Probably your #3 proposal, though I'm certainly also agreeable to #2 to a degree.
:::As for what comprises a faction, phew. Nobody would deny that ComStar and the Word of Blake are factions. The [[New Avalon Catholic Church]] at least uses the InfoBoxFactions template, is categorized as a "Religious Organisation" which is a subcategory of "Organisations" which is a subcategory of... Factions. I actually like the generic nature of the word Faction. Any somewhat unified, cohesive power - state, NGO, organized religion - is a faction, imho. This whole train of thoughts started when I stumbled across the redlink for [[Doctors Under Fire]] (in [[Legacy (Anthology)]]); another such NGO would be the [[BranthKeepers]]. Looking them up, their article also has the InfoBoxFactions. Looks like we're already doing it. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 13:58, 11 January 2022 (EST)
+
:::As for what comprises a faction, phew. Nobody would deny that ComStar and the Word of Blake are factions. The [[New Avalon Catholic Church]] at least uses the InfoBoxFactions template, is categorized as a "Religious Organisation" which is a subcategory of "Organisations" which is a subcategory of... Factions. I actually like the generic nature of the word Faction. Any somewhat unified, cohesive power - state, NGO, organized religion - is a faction, imho. This whole train of thoughts started when I stumbled across the redlink for [[Doctors Under Fire]] (in [[Legacy (anthology)]]); another such NGO would be the [[BranthKeepers]]. Looking them up, their article also has the InfoBoxFactions. Looks like we're already doing it. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 13:58, 11 January 2022 (EST)
  
 
::: I think this could work if we just swapped the terminology around - Make "Organizations" the top level category, with "Factions" a second level subcategory, at the same level as the current organization subcategories (i.e companies, criminal organizations etc). [[User:HF22|HF22]] ([[User talk:HF22|talk]]) 16:19, 11 January 2022 (EST)
 
::: I think this could work if we just swapped the terminology around - Make "Organizations" the top level category, with "Factions" a second level subcategory, at the same level as the current organization subcategories (i.e companies, criminal organizations etc). [[User:HF22|HF22]] ([[User talk:HF22|talk]]) 16:19, 11 January 2022 (EST)

Please note that all contributions to BattleTechWiki are considered to be released under the GNU FDL 1.2 (see BattleTechWiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Advanced templates:

Editing: {{Merge}}   {{Moratorium}}   {{Otheruses| | | }}

Notices: {{NoEdit}}   {{Sign}}   {{Unsigned|name}}   {{Welcome}}

Administration: {{Essay}}   {{Policy}}   {{Procedure}}