Editing User talk:Beemer
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision
Your text
Line 35:
Line 35: ==Rommel tank== ==Rommel tank== I have removed the note you inserted in the Rommel tank entry, and I feel I owe you an explanation. To be clear, there was nothing technically wrong with the note. However, the issue seems to be a potential minefield. Given the odd way this was announced and the fact that nothing has actually changed in BattleTech canon, I feel the value of noting the (potential) issue isn't worth the potential trouble. Sarna should stay well clear of that debate, if there is going to be one. Or even a debate on wether there should be a debate. Which means that simply ignoring the issue (and thus, not highlighting it in the article) is the best way forward. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 07:55, 6 November 2022 (EST) I have removed the note you inserted in the Rommel tank entry, and I feel I owe you an explanation. To be clear, there was nothing technically wrong with the note. However, the issue seems to be a potential minefield. Given the odd way this was announced and the fact that nothing has actually changed in BattleTech canon, I feel the value of noting the (potential) issue isn't worth the potential trouble. Sarna should stay well clear of that debate, if there is going to be one. Or even a debate on wether there should be a debate. Which means that simply ignoring the issue (and thus, not highlighting it in the article) is the best way forward. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 07:55, 6 November 2022 (EST) − − ::Thank you for the explanation! I'll steer clear of noting that sort of thing next time I find something like that.--[[User:Beemer|Beemer]] ([[User talk:Beemer|talk]]) 17:23, 6 November 2022 (EST)
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
==Rommel tank== | ==Rommel tank== | ||
I have removed the note you inserted in the Rommel tank entry, and I feel I owe you an explanation. To be clear, there was nothing technically wrong with the note. However, the issue seems to be a potential minefield. Given the odd way this was announced and the fact that nothing has actually changed in BattleTech canon, I feel the value of noting the (potential) issue isn't worth the potential trouble. Sarna should stay well clear of that debate, if there is going to be one. Or even a debate on wether there should be a debate. Which means that simply ignoring the issue (and thus, not highlighting it in the article) is the best way forward. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 07:55, 6 November 2022 (EST) | I have removed the note you inserted in the Rommel tank entry, and I feel I owe you an explanation. To be clear, there was nothing technically wrong with the note. However, the issue seems to be a potential minefield. Given the odd way this was announced and the fact that nothing has actually changed in BattleTech canon, I feel the value of noting the (potential) issue isn't worth the potential trouble. Sarna should stay well clear of that debate, if there is going to be one. Or even a debate on wether there should be a debate. Which means that simply ignoring the issue (and thus, not highlighting it in the article) is the best way forward. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 07:55, 6 November 2022 (EST) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||