Editing Category talk:Individual JumpShips
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision
Your text
Line 8:
Line 8:
::::Oops, sorry. I mis-understood you! Its been long day for me. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 18:30, 21 May 2009 (PDT) ::::Oops, sorry. I mis-understood you! Its been long day for me. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 18:30, 21 May 2009 (PDT)
:::::I think that such a category could become quite full very quickly. I think it would be wiser to split out the various types of craft. I also dislike the wording "Notable" because that has a specific connotation to wikis (see [[Policy:Notability]]. Perhaps "Category:Individual Ships" could be a parent category for a few categories that themselves contain the actual articles? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 19:10, 21 May 2009 (PDT) :::::I think that such a category could become quite full very quickly. I think it would be wiser to split out the various types of craft. I also dislike the wording "Notable" because that has a specific connotation to wikis (see [[Policy:Notability]]. Perhaps "Category:Individual Ships" could be a parent category for a few categories that themselves contain the actual articles? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 19:10, 21 May 2009 (PDT)
− ::::::If its felt that it should be broken up into into sub-categories. I will go along with it. I didn't realize there would be clash with policy article's name. Category:Individual Ships has my vote. Also, my intensions was to highlight ships that were ''extremely'' high profile. Which have appear repeatively in the novels & source books. Which is something that seldom happens from my readings of both types of sources. Most of the time, aside from WarShips, most of ships most listed are throw away names give by the author. Which inturn Seldom seen or used again. Thus why I suggested come up with ''Notable Ships''. T-Rex and Voidswimmer, have been seen in multiple sources or repeatively in number of novels. Ships have minor appearance, like ONCE but still significante, i've listed with the category for the Class of ship it belongs to without listing individual name. Example: [[Argo Submersible Carrier#Notable Ships]] -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 04:36, 22 May 2009 (PDT)
− :::::::::I am creating Individual Ships on suggestion of Scaletail. Renaming Notable Ships to Individual Ships and moving my two entries into Individual JumpShips. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 11:19, 29 May 2009 (PDT)
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::::Oops, sorry. I mis-understood you! Its been long day for me. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 18:30, 21 May 2009 (PDT) | ::::Oops, sorry. I mis-understood you! Its been long day for me. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 18:30, 21 May 2009 (PDT) | ||
:::::I think that such a category could become quite full very quickly. I think it would be wiser to split out the various types of craft. I also dislike the wording "Notable" because that has a specific connotation to wikis (see [[Policy:Notability]]. Perhaps "Category:Individual Ships" could be a parent category for a few categories that themselves contain the actual articles? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 19:10, 21 May 2009 (PDT) | :::::I think that such a category could become quite full very quickly. I think it would be wiser to split out the various types of craft. I also dislike the wording "Notable" because that has a specific connotation to wikis (see [[Policy:Notability]]. Perhaps "Category:Individual Ships" could be a parent category for a few categories that themselves contain the actual articles? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 19:10, 21 May 2009 (PDT) | ||
− | |||
− |