Editing Information:Humor

{{essay|BTW:JOKE|BTW:LOL|BTW:FUNNY|BTW:HAHA}}<!-- Do not add a {{humor}} tag here, as this page itself is not humor. -->
{{Nutshell|when and how [[w:Humour|humor]] is acceptable on BattleTechWiki}}

==Humor needs indicators==
{{shortcut|BTW:HREQ}}
Humor that is counter to the truth or verifiability of a page on BattleTechWiki requires clear and concise indicators. Humor used inappropriately, without indicators, can and often does result in blocks or other corrective actions against editors.

On talk pages, text can be marked inline with <code>{{[[template:Understatement|understatement]]}}</code>,<code>{{[[template:sarcasm|sarcasm]]}}</code> Or <code>{{[[Template:Jokes|jokes]]}}</code>. Sarcasm following these methods can [[BTW:INDCRIT|prevent many disagreements]] from escalating. 

Outside of the article namespace, full pages or sections can be marked with indicators before lead paragraphs or under the section header such as <code>{{[[template:humor|humor]]}}</code>.

{{Humor disclosure templates}}

==<span class="anchor" id="Responsible humor"></span>Why responsible humor is important==
{{Shortcuts|BTW:SKUNK|BTW:RESPONSIBLE}}
[[File:Striped Skunk (Mephitis mephitis) 01 (cropped).jpg|thumb|upright=0.75|No one wants to be the skunk at the garden party, but we have responsibilities.]]

No one wants to be the skunk at the garden party, but BattleTechWiki is no longer the fledgling experiment it was back in the 2000s. It's now the world's foremost repository of humanity's collective knowledge, and with that privilege comes some custodial responsibilities. The benefits of humor in helping boost editor retention must be weighed against its potential for disruption. Consider:
* '''Humor is sometimes misinterpreted''' – Sarcasm is hard to convey in writing that lacks the cues of verbal communication. Many editors and administrators have spent hours resolving disputes arising from this.
* '''Irresponsible humor damages BattleTechWiki's credibility''' – We've all worked hard to ''cultivate the reputation for trustworthiness'' BattleTechWiki enjoys. Readers come here expecting information, and when they find jokes instead, they lose faith in our reliability.
* '''Not everyone is looking for humor''' – Sometimes, an editor is engaged in a serious task and just wants to focus on it. Clear disclosure gives them the option to do so, whereas undisclosed jokes often draw attention and take time to figure out.

Think of the disclosure requirement not as an obstacle, but as a challenge. Humor can still be funny even when it's disclosed — try reading [[w:Wikipedia:Sarcasm is really helpful|Sarcasm is really helpful]] with a straight face — it just needs to be, well, good.

== Humor in articles ==
There is no clear [[BTW:CON|consensus]] as to when and how humor should be included in articles.

If humorous content is included in an article, it must be done in such a way as to meet all the usual article requirements, including:

* [[BTW:V|Verifiability]]
* [[BTW:NPOV|Neutral point-of-view]]
* [[BTW:RS|Reliable sources]]

Writing an article ''about'' humor or humorous subjects is not the same as adding humor ''to'' an article.  One can write "dry" articles on humor, should that be considered appropriate.  This concept is somewhat analogous to the style guidelines for [[BattleTechWiki:Manual of Style/BattleTech Style Guide|writing about BattleTech fiction]].

===How humor can be included===
When a humorous work on a subject has attracted enough attention to be [[BTW:V|verifiable]] in [[BTW:RS|reliable sources]], it can be appropriate to reference that work on the page for the subject it is written about.  For example, whereas an article in ''[[w:The Onion|The Onion]]'' might not be an acceptable source/reference to use to add a humorous observation to a page, if an article in ''The Onion'' attracts outside attention, such as [https://web.archive.org/web/20090331112144/http://music-mix.ew.com/2009/03/soundgarden-reu.html here], then the humorous article can be mentioned, using the source written about it.

== Humor outside of articles == 
{{Rquote |1=right |2=Humor is the grease of communications. |3=Unknown}}

Outside the encyclopedic content, humor is often seen on BattleTechWiki pages.  The primary purpose of [[BattleTechWiki:Project namespace|project namespace]] and similar namespaces are to coordinate the mission – the building of the encyclopedia – but being a human community, humor often appears as well. Humor can appear in many different ways, with considerable overlap.  These ways include:

* Sometimes editors just highlight the humor — in articles or other areas — without intending to criticize at all.
* Sometimes editors create humor for its own sake in out-of-the-way places where readers are unlikely to find it.
* Humor is often used in attempts to "lighten the mood" in an active discussion, with varying degrees of success and failure.
* Irony is often used to illustrate a point.
* Humor is sometimes used to illustrate a point without irony.
* Editors often make jokes about the BattleTechWiki, and/or which are intended for other editors. These may sometimes qualify as "in-jokes", as without community experience, the humor will be lessened or lost.
* Editors sometimes voice the opinion that other editors are taking a given issue too seriously, and will create "spoofs" of the issue, which many find humorous.

Humor tends to be very subjective.  One should remain aware that what one finds hilarious, another may find offensive.  The use of humor does not override such core policies as [[BTW:CIV|Civility]] and [[BTW:NPA|No Personal Attacks]].

Many pages which at least some editors found funny have been categorized into [[:Category:Humor]].

== See also ==

* [[Information:Rules for Fools]]
* [[:Category:Humor]]

== External links ==
* [https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:How_To_Be_Funny_And_Not_Just_Stupid Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid]
* [[d:Wikidata:Humour|Wikidata:Humour]]

[[Category:Humor]]