Editing User talk:68.81.95.145
This user is currently blocked. The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:
- 19:24, 16 July 2009 Revanche talk contribs blocked 68.81.95.145 talk with an expiration time of indefinite (anonymous users only, account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) (Intimidating behaviour/harassment: standard vandalism)
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision
Your text
Line 24:
Line 24: Hello. We really haven't decided on any policies just yet regarding people vandalizing intentionally. I'm afraid we also don't have a policy yet addressing how people may contest a ban. So, in the mean time, I went ahead and just choose to ban you indefinitely. I figured no one will really get upset over that, so its probably a good judge of consensus. If/when we get around to setting up the procedures for contesting, and if you disagree with your indefinite ban, please consider contesting it at that time. I'd be willing to email you when that option was made available, but unfortunately, you cannot register at this time, either so you can't receive emails. Them's the breaks. Glad you had fun, though. It was fun for us, too, to see easy reverts and an indefinite ban in action. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 23:53, 16 July 2009 (UTC) Hello. We really haven't decided on any policies just yet regarding people vandalizing intentionally. I'm afraid we also don't have a policy yet addressing how people may contest a ban. So, in the mean time, I went ahead and just choose to ban you indefinitely. I figured no one will really get upset over that, so its probably a good judge of consensus. If/when we get around to setting up the procedures for contesting, and if you disagree with your indefinite ban, please consider contesting it at that time. I'd be willing to email you when that option was made available, but unfortunately, you cannot register at this time, either so you can't receive emails. Them's the breaks. Glad you had fun, though. It was fun for us, too, to see easy reverts and an indefinite ban in action. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 23:53, 16 July 2009 (UTC) − Note to Admins: this user was blocked based upon [http://sarna.net/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Ebakunin&oldid=54727#blanking_pages this threat] to continue blanking pages and [http://sarna.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:NPA-4&oldid=54775 this threat] to what appears to be the previous Editor of the template. Request to be unblocked was ignored, for no such policy has yet been adopted. (Note also: vandal is also trolling by trying to create unblock templates, which lead to no established categories, indicating the attempt was to get blocked as quickly as possible so that it could attempt to harass the site via the (non-existant) unblock process.) --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 02:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)+ {{Unblock|Ip address should never be blocked indefinitely because ip address might be moved to different internet and you might block incorrect person.}}
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Hello. We really haven't decided on any policies just yet regarding people vandalizing intentionally. I'm afraid we also don't have a policy yet addressing how people may contest a ban. So, in the mean time, I went ahead and just choose to ban you indefinitely. I figured no one will really get upset over that, so its probably a good judge of consensus. If/when we get around to setting up the procedures for contesting, and if you disagree with your indefinite ban, please consider contesting it at that time. I'd be willing to email you when that option was made available, but unfortunately, you cannot register at this time, either so you can't receive emails. Them's the breaks. Glad you had fun, though. It was fun for us, too, to see easy reverts and an indefinite ban in action. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 23:53, 16 July 2009 (UTC) | Hello. We really haven't decided on any policies just yet regarding people vandalizing intentionally. I'm afraid we also don't have a policy yet addressing how people may contest a ban. So, in the mean time, I went ahead and just choose to ban you indefinitely. I figured no one will really get upset over that, so its probably a good judge of consensus. If/when we get around to setting up the procedures for contesting, and if you disagree with your indefinite ban, please consider contesting it at that time. I'd be willing to email you when that option was made available, but unfortunately, you cannot register at this time, either so you can't receive emails. Them's the breaks. Glad you had fun, though. It was fun for us, too, to see easy reverts and an indefinite ban in action. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 23:53, 16 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | {{Unblock|Ip address should never be blocked indefinitely because ip address might be moved to different internet and you might block incorrect person.}} | |