Editing User talk:Neufeld

__TOC__

{{Welcome|Neufeld|Christer Nyfält}}

== Year pages ==

Neufeld, can you please hold off on making the changes to those articles. The single division addition you made doesn't match what appears to be where consenus is heading and it will all be undone. Plus, since the policy hasn't even been written yet (since it hasn't been agreed to either), some people are thinking that what you are doing is the final form. I appreciate the drive you're showing, but let us firm up what the page will look like. I'll then write 9hopefully) easy instructions on how to use the code you're experimenting with. It'll be at least seven days from final consensus, but then you'll be free for take off once the policy is released (which will make the main page). Thanks. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 18:24, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
: Ok. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 18:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

== Canon policy ==

Thank you all your efforts to add info from TRO:3050U to the 'Mech articles. While I appreciate your zeal in adding missing Battle Values to these 'Mechs, information from non-canon sources must be very clearly separate from information from canon sources to reflect the authority that the latter have. I, too, would like to see that information available, but Solaris Skunkworks is not a canon source and so cannot be used for this purpose. Please read [[Policy:Canon]] for more information. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 23:38, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

== All Purpose Award ==

I know it may seem to be a 'I'll scratch your back, you scratch mine' kinda deal at first look (since you gave me an AP today), I do sincerely feel appreciative for your highlighting of numerous 'articles' that needed killin', err, deleting. For getting into the guts of BTW to weed out the chaff, I present you with the All Purpose ribbon:
:[[File:AP.jpg|All Purpose Award, 1st ribbon]]

:: Thanks! --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 05:24, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

== Command Console ==

Hi Neufeld, hope things are well for you.  I had question, since you've been updating or sprucing up the Duel Cockpit. Are you planning to do the [[Command Console]] article too? [[Tactical Operations]] has it in the book as Cockpit Command Console.  I'm not up on the old rules, so i'm not sure if the older Command Console rules are similar. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 19:49, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
: I'm right now mostly focusing on how to represent rules, and not the details. (see [[Policy Talk:Canon]]) So, I haven't planned visiting that article right now. Might do some research into later. Haven't got access to older rules. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 19:53, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
:: I took a look at the Command Console, and added what I found in TO. Some rules was a bit different to what was in the article, so I marked those sections as OLD:. I'm now finished with that article, until we make some decision on how to represent rules. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 21:04, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the assistance, Neufeld. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 01:13, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

==Tnx==

Hi, tnx for your help though your afterwork of my articles. My english isn't perfect and you help me to correct my false speaking if necessary. I Read above that you will add some information about the academies from the LAAF. Let us work togehter and expand this project to all academiess. What are you thinking about it? [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] 07:27, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
: I have added what I intended to add. I'm not interested in doing more academies now. The only thing I would like to see added is the academy logos from Handbook: House Steiner. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 12:04, 29 March 2010 (UTC)


==3050==
Great job, Neufeld, with [[3050]]. In order to synch up with policy, I made some changes to it. Please take a look. If you and I start everyone off the the same foot, we'll hopefully avoid what happened to the pages previously. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 17:37, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
:Just read [[3051]]. Great work, again. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 17:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
::Thanks, I hope I got everything. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 17:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

==3052==
Hy, why you delete the Battle of Luthien from the year page, i think it is a significant date.[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 20:28, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
: The [[Battle of Luthien]] article don't have the date. You add the date there, and I will add it back in [[3052]]. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 20:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

== Reversion ==

Morning, Neufeld. I agree with your reversion on [[:Category:Burst-Fire Weapons‎‎]]. It doesn't appear to be vandalism, but it didn't make much sense. Probably the first attempts by a new Editor, but it was obviously abandoned.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 11:30, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
:I was wondering if he tried to list mechs with burst-fire weapons. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 13:09, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

== Random Act of Appreciation Award ==

Because I haven't given one of these in a while and your name came up. Glad you're contributing, Neufeld.
:[[File:RAA.jpg|Random Act of Appreciation Award, 1st ribbon]] 
--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 18:09, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
:Thanks! --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 18:26, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

== Battle Value worksheet ==

Neufeld, please have a look at the template: [[User:Mbear/BVWorksheet]]. Comments welcome.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]] 14:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
: I'll take a look and comment on the talk page. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 16:18, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

== Thanks ==

Thanks for taking care of the BV categories. I had planned on doing that when I came back from vacation (now), but now I don't have to! In appreciation, I give you an all-purpose award. [[File:AP 1bol.jpg|All Purpose Award, 2nd ribbon]] --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 23:33, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
: Agreed. Well done. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 01:00, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
:: And thank you for the reward. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 06:48, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

== Mace redirects ==
As you saw, I have moved Mace to Mace (custom vehicle). However, I reckon we should leave the redirect in place until somebody creates the "real" article for the canonical Mace. If I was the person who had created the original fanon article then I would re-visit my own article, and unless there's a new article in its place moving the fanon away without a redirect might be mistaken for a deletion. For the same reason I reckon there should be a note of some sort on the talk page.<br>Generally, please don't simply blank pages. They should be deleted, or if you can't do that, put in a deletion tag. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 15:35, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
: As I saw it a redirect is more confusing than a blank page. Especially since people would expect to find mace - the weapon following a mace link. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 16:43, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

== Vandervahn Chistu ==

Hey Neufeld - Question : I understand the flag you put up only if you intend to put a whole bunch of stuff from the animated series in there. Why is it an issue? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 23:10, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
: Well, I thought better safe than sorry. Remove it if you thinks its fine without it. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 23:19, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
:: I respect your concerns. All I know is all my sources are canon. If you're concerned about the image, I know there's one pic of him from the JF book and another from the TCG. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 23:29, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

== Notable pilots: Possible answer ==

Please review: [[BattleTechWiki_talk:Project_BattleMechs#Notable_Pilots_Sample_page]]. Thanks!--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]] 14:17, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

== Clan Khans ==
Hi Neufeld, i was wondering if you would like some help with the Clan Khan profiles? -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 15:27, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
: Well, I'm just adding the very basics from Op:Klondike like clan and birthdate, so feel free to add more stuff. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 15:30, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

== Battle Armor info question ==
Hello Neufeld, i had question for you. You rightfully informed me of my ignorance about having to put reference information from linked info from the year page.  The [[Battle Armor]] page itself is a sort-of out of game info.  With no reference section, Are we suppose to put that sort thing in pages like that? I'll be bold do it, but doesn't seem right i guess. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 22:47, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
: I see no problem putting in-game history in the article, on the other hand some people seems to have problems with putting things related to game rules in articles. Be bold about it. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 22:55, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

==Question==
Hy Neufeld, i don't know if you add the variant content to the [[Nightsky]], yes or no ??, when yes i must say sorry, the source falls under the moratorium. Greetings--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 18:24, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
: No I didn't add it. But it is annoying to see people not knowing about the moratorium getting reverted all the time. It also gives an unfriendly impression. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 18:26, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
:: Ok you're right. It was not my intention to give unfriendly impression.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 18:31, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
::: It would be better to continue this discussion on the template discussion page. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 18:34, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

==Clan Widowmaker saKhan Sanders==
Hi Neufeld, i had left out a link to saKhan Sander from Khan Karrige's page due to lack of any information or profile on her.  I was to add link when there was something on her. Won't be better not have red-link to something that likely for immeditate future not have a page unless they have some kind of book or something on her? -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 01:15, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
: I feel that it is better to add the link right from the start, otherwise it is likely to be forgotten. Also with a red-link people see that the page is missing right from the beginning, without it they would have to search for the character first. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 06:32, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

==Award==
Hy Neufeld, nice to see you back after a while, i give you this [[File:RAA_1bol.jpg|Random Act of Appreciation Award, 2nd ribbon]] award, for the documents categorization.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 11:24, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
:Thanks! However, a part of the honor goes to BrokenMnemonic, since he made me notice the existence of that category. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 11:30, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

==Question==
Hy Neufeld, please take a look on Neulings Variants+Manufacturers talk page, i don't understand this guy, he is on sarna.net over one year and dont follow any policys, please take a look on the Variants...page and give me a response what you think of the page, all the info can add in the various manufacturing center pages, sorry for rough writing.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 21:45, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
: It is a badly formated mess. It is typical of his contributions. I no longer want to deal with his edits, and they are a big reason why I have given up working of the toumans house military pages. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 06:10, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

:: Hy Neufeld, its suprise me that you use such hard words. I agree that sometimes my work is in some way chaotic but "always a mess" in your opinion , please that is under your niveau. I think the work I put it in the Sarna project is misunderstood. I create many of the mercanery articles and gives them their initial content and rework them later. Many user consider my work with suspicion. I will rethink if it usefull to me and the community to continue the cooperation, because I improved my work over the last months but that is not enougth, I think to meet the standards of the sarna.net. I had ideas but they are worthless, because when I something greated what is not in the common way it is deleted, changed back or merged with other articles. I understand you as admin which have the task to enforce the politics of the community. I'm not angry about you or the other users. Perhaps in the furture it exist a way to show my work at an different place and with the tolerance/acceptance of the community. Thnx for your support. [[User:Neuling|Neuling]] 16:10, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
::: Two hints to avoid annoying people: 1. Do not use tables. 2. Figure out formating before you start adding a lot of info, and experiment either in the sandbox or a userpage (like Mbear added). --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 18:56, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
::::Oh my god, thanks, you talke this in a view words, what i want to say,...:).--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 19:14, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

==Citations==
Hy Neufeld please can you add citations to the Shin Legion article and other summarys you added, that was very helpfull, thanks, oh and great work to cleanup the DCMS page.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 14:18, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
: I'll see what I can do, since I mostly tweaked and edited information already in existence somewhere on the wiki. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 14:25, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

==Category==
Hy Neufeld, i see your new created militia pages, and i found a failur in the added category, not military --> Lyran Militia Commands is the right category.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 00:39, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
: Ah, OK. Thanks. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 07:31, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

==Lyran Royal Guards==
Hi Neufeld,

I've been uploading unit logo images from ''[[Historical: Reunification War]]'' and adding them to unit entries. I noticed that you're editing the [[Royal Guards]] - there's now a logo for the [[4th Royal Guards]] if you want to include it in the article when it's done: [[:File:4th_Royal_Guards_2596.png]] [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] 19:50, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
:Well, the under construction is something that has been there for a long time, so I removed it. I also added the logo at the same time. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 23:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

== Steiner dates ==

Neufeld, you need to pause in your edits. Your semantic code is visible to all and isn't doing what it should be doing for the article. Done properly, the code would not be seen. Please contact [[User talk:Seth|Seth]] before taking any further steps to get guidance on how to update these articles properly. Thanks.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 14:32, 17 March 2012 (PDT)
:Hy Neufeld you must create at first a Template and Property page, but Revanche talke to you the best way is you contact Seth to help with this.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 14:42, 17 March 2012 (PDT)
::Take a look how Seth handle this on the following pages [[Template:Red Corsair Timeline]], [[Property:Red Corsair Event]] and see the result on this page [[Red Corsair#Red Corsair Campaign Timeline]], i hope this helps.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 15:01, 17 March 2012 (PDT)
:::I tried to use the same approach, but could not get it to work. Templates are too hard to use. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 15:04, 17 March 2012 (PDT)
::::Talk to Seth he help and give you a guidline.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 15:05, 17 March 2012 (PDT)
:Good job. Appears to be hidden, now.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 12:15, 18 March 2012 (PDT)

==Semantic wiki==
Hy Neufeld i talk to Seth and he give us this guidline, great stuff, [[BattleTechWiki talk:SemanticMediaWiki]].--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 04:16, 18 March 2012 (PDT)
:I added "display:none;" to the span tag for the template since my phone didn't resize the font to 0. Should be good now. You can see if the properties are added properly by previewing an edit. Properties are displayed as "Facts about this Page".--[[User:Seth|Seth]] 10:24, 18 March 2012 (PDT)
::I also noticed that you haven't defined the properties [[Property:Inherited From]] and [[Property:Name of the Realm]] as either <nowiki>[[Has type::page]] or [[Has type::text]]</nowiki> (depending on what you want)--[[User:Seth|Seth]] 10:30, 18 March 2012 (PDT)
:::Thanks. I will go and correct that. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 10:32, 18 March 2012 (PDT)

==Timeline Stuff==

Errors:
* Victor gets listed from his Archon entry.
:This can be fixed by renaming the properties that define who the FedSuns charts are looking for. For example, instead of it looking for the <nowiki>[[Inherited From::]]</nowiki>, you can have specific properties for each realm like <nowiki>[[FedSuns Inherited From::]]</nowiki> and so on with the rest of the properties. You'll have to create a separate template page for each realm as well since the current template works best with the list of Archons. Once you do those two things, your chart code will look like this:
<pre>{{#ask:[[Category:FedSuns Rulers]]
|?First Prince Reign Began=Reign Began
|?First Prince Reign Ended=Reign Ended
|?First Prince Inherited From=Inherited From
|?First Prince Title=Title
|sort=First Prince Reign Began
|order=ascending
|format=table
|mainlabel=First Princes of the Federated Suns Realm
|limit=1000
}}
</pre>
Adding the "=Reign Began" to the line "|?First Prince Reign Began" ensures that your table still looks like the Archon one.--[[User:Seth|Seth]] 22:36, 21 March 2012 (PDT) 
* Presidents lacks the First Princes category.
:You can have your template add a category to all pages you add the template to. So you don't have to have your Semantic Table look for pages in a Category that already exists. If you add <nowiki>"[[Category:FedSuns Rulers]]</nowiki> to your template, any page you add that template to will be listed under the "FedSuns Rulers" category. Then instead of having this line at the top of your table:
<pre>{{#ask:[[Category:First Princes]]</pre>
you would have:
<pre>{{#ask:[[Category:FedSuns Rulers]]</pre>
This is especially useful for Kathrine Steiner-Davion who was the defacto ruler of the FedSuns for a few years.--[[User:Seth|Seth]] 22:36, 21 March 2012 (PDT)
::I see you have been adding the <nowiki>[[Category:Federated Suns Rulers]]</nowiki> manually to each FedSun's ruler's page. It's not necessary to do that. Simply add it to the "Template:First Prince Timeline" page. Once you do that, any page that you add that template to will automatically add the "<nowiki>[[Category:Federated Suns Rulers]]</nowiki>" tag to the bottom. Must faster that way, trust me.--[[User:Seth|Seth]] 22:50, 22 March 2012 (PDT)
:::Thanks! Stuff seems to work correctly now. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 00:58, 23 March 2012 (PDT)

::::Hy Neufeld i see you added at this morning some semantic stuff to the First Princes, but not all members are shown in the timetable?--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 10:17, 24 March 2012 (PDT)
:::::Well, Alexander is missing since I have not decided how to deal with the regency, and I have not added data for the Succession Wars era rulers.--[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 10:38, 24 March 2012 (PDT)

== Hey ==

Neufeld - I want to apologize for some of my past comments to you. I over-reacted to something, but that was no excuse. If you'd like to have a civil discussion about my [[AFFC]] article or anything else, I'd be very appreciative. Thanks. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 22:23, 23 March 2012 (PDT)
:Apology accepted. As for the various armed forces articles, I do not feel like working on or discussing them right now. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 00:00, 24 March 2012 (PDT)

==Thanks==
Thanks for taking care of the links on the [[Dianne Sennet]] page as well as the name change.  That was a bad one on my part. --[[User:Rebs|Rebs]] 15:28, 26 March 2012 (PDT)

== The Battle of New Avalon ==

Neufeld - I added a citation for McCarel Farm. Its like this: The "First Battle of New Avalon" actually means "First Battle of New Avalon during the Jihad". (There is a reference.) Regarding your FCCW argument, I see your point. Basically, we're talking about five battles:
* First Battle of New Avalon (FCCW): 1st Davion Guards vs. three of Katherine's units
* Second Battle of New Avalon (FCCW) : Victor's task force finally takes Katherine down
* First Battle of New Avalon (Jihad) : 31st Division Attacks
* Second Battle of New Avalon (Jihad) : 31st and 36th Divisions Attack
* Third Battle of New Avalon (Jihad) : 44th Shadow Division leads the 31st and 36th Divisions in an attack
I have suggested that the latter three be consolidated on a single article called [[Battle of New Avalon (Jihad)]], and we should likely do the same for the FCCW. Again, there ARE references, and I have added the citation. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 00:57, 13 May 2012 (PDT)
: Sounds like a good solution. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 01:34, 13 May 2012 (PDT)
@@ Line 84: / Line 84: @@
 == Battle Armor info question ==
-Hello Neufeld, i had question for you. You rightfully informed me of my ignorance about having to put reference information from linked info from the year page.  The [[battle armor]] page itself is a sort-of out of game info.  With no reference section, Are we suppose to put that sort thing in pages like that? I'll be bold do it, but doesn't seem right i guess. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 22:47, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
+Hello Neufeld, i had question for you. You rightfully informed me of my ignorance about having to put reference information from linked info from the year page.  The [[Battle Armor]] page itself is a sort-of out of game info.  With no reference section, Are we suppose to put that sort thing in pages like that? I'll be bold do it, but doesn't seem right i guess. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 22:47, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 : I see no problem putting in-game history in the article, on the other hand some people seems to have problems with putting things related to game rules in articles. Be bold about it. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 22:55, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
@@ Line 186: / Line 186: @@
 I have suggested that the latter three be consolidated on a single article called [[Battle of New Avalon (Jihad)]], and we should likely do the same for the FCCW. Again, there ARE references, and I have added the citation. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 00:57, 13 May 2012 (PDT)
 : Sounds like a good solution. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 01:34, 13 May 2012 (PDT)
-==Lynn McKenna==
-Glad you helped out there!  I know you are a fan of the [[Raven Alliance]], so if you know of sources and stuff, that would be excellent.   Her article will likely be an ongoing project for a few days. It will probably be a long one too, as was the [[Stephen McKenna]] article.--[[User:Rebs|Rebs]] 03:16, 24 June 2012 (PDT)
-: Well, I will keep my eyes open if I spot something to add, but it is not like I am good at writing biographies or have some special notes compiled on Raven stuff. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 06:15, 24 June 2012 (PDT)
-::No problem!  Jihad: Final Reckoning provided a great deal of info (great book), and that was what I needed.  And thanks for noting the conflict about Storm Crow Naval Pursuit Star's CO...   that one was vexing me a bit. --[[User:Rebs|Rebs]] 20:04, 25 June 2012 (PDT)
-== Hiding User Creation and Deletion in Recent Changes ==
-Is it possible to hide user creations, deletions and mergers on the [[Special:RecentChanges]] page? It is annoying to see the log flooded by those messages, just now there is one real edit in the last 50 changes, the rest are all related to user management. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 02:44, 16 July 2012 (PDT)
-:Neufeld, in the RecentChanges page there's a drop down list with various Namespaces in it. By default it shows everything. To just see real entries (updated/modified pages) select the '''(Main)''' namespace from the drop down list and hit the '''Go''' button. That should give you what you need.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 07:53, 16 July 2012 (PDT)
-::Yes, that makes it much better. Thanks! --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 09:19, 16 July 2012 (PDT)
-== Updated conflict infobox ==
-Neufeld, please have a look at [[User:Mbear/PlanetPageTest]]. I've got a prototype for the updated infobox up and running. I'd like to hear your thoughts. Thanks!--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 07:25, 2 November 2012 (PDT)
-:It looks fine to me. If anything needs to change then it would be just some minor formating tweaks. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] ([[User talk:Neufeld|talk]]) 16:38, 3 November 2012 (PDT)
-::It seems that I posted a little too early. I found three minor issues: "forces involved" needs to start with a capital letter, links to the factions would also be nice and location needs to include planet and faction. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] ([[User talk:Neufeld|talk]]) 16:45, 3 November 2012 (PDT)
-:::Neufeld - I agree with you on the capitalization. The other two issues you mention are perfectly legit, but would be the responsibility of the article's writer/editor. Neither are impacted by the box's format. (As for this particular battle, this won't be the final product.) [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 05:05, 5 November 2012 (PST)
-:::Fixed first one. Second and Third are responsibility of article author.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]]<sup>([[User_talk:Mbear|talk]])</sup> 06:16, 5 November 2012 (PST)