Editing Starslayer
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision
Your text
Line 57:
Line 57: ==Notes== ==Notes== − * The STY-3C ''Starslayer'' was introduced in the ''[[McCarron's Armored Cavalry (scenario pack)|McCarron's Armored Cavalry]]'' scenario pack, where the eponymous [[mercenary unit]] fields at least one STY-3C ''Starslayer'' (implied to be a piece of lostech they found) in [[3044]].<ref name=MCACp20/> Similarly, the STY-3C appears on the [[Random Allocation Tables]] in ''[[Historical: Operation Klondike]]'', indicating it must have been available prior to the [[Operation EXODUS|Exodus]]. However, the introduction date of the STY-3C was [[3056]] according to ''[[Technical Readout: 3058]]'' and according to the official Errata on the [[BattleTech forum]], the STY-2C variant should take its place on the RATs in ''Historical: Operation Klondike''. Consequentially, it can be assumed that the STY-3C from ''McCarron's Armored Cavalry'' should be a -2C model instead, too, although no official errata exist for that scenario pack. + * The STY-3C ''Starslayer'' was introduced in the ''[[McCarron's Armored Cavalry (scenario pack)|McCarron's Armored Cavalry]]'' scenario pack, where the eponymous [[mercenary unit]] fields at least one STY-3C ''Starslayer'' (implied to be a piece of lostech they found) in [[3044]].<ref name=MCACp20/> Similarly, the STY-3C appears on the [[Random Allocation Tables]] in ''[[Historical: Operation Klondike]]'', indicating it must have been available prior to the [[Exodus]]. However, the introduction date of the STY-3C was [[3056]] according to ''[[Technical Readout: 3058]]'' and according to the official Errata on the [[BattleTech forum]], the STY-2C variant should take its place on the RATs in ''Historical: Operation Klondike''. Consequentially, it can be assumed that the STY-3C from ''McCarron's Armored Cavalry'' should be a -2C model instead, too, although no official errata exist for that scenario pack. * In ''[[Combat Operations]]'', the Battle Value for the ''STY-3C'' is given as BV (1.0) = 1,286.<ref name=COp139/> * In ''[[Combat Operations]]'', the Battle Value for the ''STY-3C'' is given as BV (1.0) = 1,286.<ref name=COp139/>
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
| − | * The STY-3C ''Starslayer'' was introduced in the ''[[McCarron's Armored Cavalry (scenario pack)|McCarron's Armored Cavalry]]'' scenario pack, where the eponymous [[mercenary unit]] fields at least one STY-3C ''Starslayer'' (implied to be a piece of lostech they found) in [[3044]].<ref name=MCACp20/> Similarly, the STY-3C appears on the [[Random Allocation Tables]] in ''[[Historical: Operation Klondike]]'', indicating it must have been available prior to the [[ | + | * The STY-3C ''Starslayer'' was introduced in the ''[[McCarron's Armored Cavalry (scenario pack)|McCarron's Armored Cavalry]]'' scenario pack, where the eponymous [[mercenary unit]] fields at least one STY-3C ''Starslayer'' (implied to be a piece of lostech they found) in [[3044]].<ref name=MCACp20/> Similarly, the STY-3C appears on the [[Random Allocation Tables]] in ''[[Historical: Operation Klondike]]'', indicating it must have been available prior to the [[Exodus]]. However, the introduction date of the STY-3C was [[3056]] according to ''[[Technical Readout: 3058]]'' and according to the official Errata on the [[BattleTech forum]], the STY-2C variant should take its place on the RATs in ''Historical: Operation Klondike''. Consequentially, it can be assumed that the STY-3C from ''McCarron's Armored Cavalry'' should be a -2C model instead, too, although no official errata exist for that scenario pack. |
* In ''[[Combat Operations]]'', the Battle Value for the ''STY-3C'' is given as BV (1.0) = 1,286.<ref name=COp139/> | * In ''[[Combat Operations]]'', the Battle Value for the ''STY-3C'' is given as BV (1.0) = 1,286.<ref name=COp139/> | ||