Editing Talk:3071
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision
Your text
Line 7:
Line 7: Is possible not to include the individual battles unless their big ones? If you read [[Operation Ice Storm]], you'll see things are rapidly happening and worlds are exchanging quickly. I was trying to keep the clutter down to minimum, by putting my entry June - Ice Hellion Invasion begins with the "invasion" being wikilink to main article since Operation ice Storm isn't what the Clan themselves called it. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 11:30, 22 April 2010 (UTC) Is possible not to include the individual battles unless their big ones? If you read [[Operation Ice Storm]], you'll see things are rapidly happening and worlds are exchanging quickly. I was trying to keep the clutter down to minimum, by putting my entry June - Ice Hellion Invasion begins with the "invasion" being wikilink to main article since Operation ice Storm isn't what the Clan themselves called it. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 11:30, 22 April 2010 (UTC) :Per policy, I can only link to articles that provide the same facts that are made in the Year page statement; otherwise, I have to edit the statement to match the article that provides the best knowledge on the subject. Small battles are fine, as long as they are supported by articles. Remember: the statement should not have information that is not also in the article.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 11:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC) :Per policy, I can only link to articles that provide the same facts that are made in the Year page statement; otherwise, I have to edit the statement to match the article that provides the best knowledge on the subject. Small battles are fine, as long as they are supported by articles. Remember: the statement should not have information that is not also in the article.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 11:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC) − :Okay: your statements on my talk page and here weren't as clear as you intended. I see by your change to the article (dangerous to do, BTW, when an InUse tag is displayed) what you intended and I moved it up to the right section ("Battles").--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 12:16, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Is possible not to include the individual battles unless their big ones? If you read [[Operation Ice Storm]], you'll see things are rapidly happening and worlds are exchanging quickly. I was trying to keep the clutter down to minimum, by putting my entry June - Ice Hellion Invasion begins with the "invasion" being wikilink to main article since Operation ice Storm isn't what the Clan themselves called it. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 11:30, 22 April 2010 (UTC) | Is possible not to include the individual battles unless their big ones? If you read [[Operation Ice Storm]], you'll see things are rapidly happening and worlds are exchanging quickly. I was trying to keep the clutter down to minimum, by putting my entry June - Ice Hellion Invasion begins with the "invasion" being wikilink to main article since Operation ice Storm isn't what the Clan themselves called it. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 11:30, 22 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Per policy, I can only link to articles that provide the same facts that are made in the Year page statement; otherwise, I have to edit the statement to match the article that provides the best knowledge on the subject. Small battles are fine, as long as they are supported by articles. Remember: the statement should not have information that is not also in the article.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 11:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC) | :Per policy, I can only link to articles that provide the same facts that are made in the Year page statement; otherwise, I have to edit the statement to match the article that provides the best knowledge on the subject. Small battles are fine, as long as they are supported by articles. Remember: the statement should not have information that is not also in the article.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 11:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | |||