Difference between revisions of "Talk:Brocchi's Cluster"
m (→40 or 55?) |
m (→40 or 55?) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==40 or 55?== | ==40 or 55?== | ||
Some maps show Brocchi's as having 40 systems in the cluster, while some maps (2750 until 2822) show it having 55. -[[User:Volt|Volt]] ([[User talk:Volt|talk]]) 02:54, 8 September 2014 (PDT) | Some maps show Brocchi's as having 40 systems in the cluster, while some maps (2750 until 2822) show it having 55. -[[User:Volt|Volt]] ([[User talk:Volt|talk]]) 02:54, 8 September 2014 (PDT) | ||
− | :Think the 2750-2822 maps reflect the Catalyst position that the number for clusters represents inhabited planets/systems. This doesn't jive with the detail in Historical: Reunification War about the Badlands Cluster having one inhabited world in the text, but a much higher number on maps, and I pointed this out, but... *shrugs* Most reasonable explanation is that in light of the new position, the drop in numbers represents worlds being abandoned/depopulated. | + | :Think the 2750-2822 maps reflect the Catalyst position that the number for clusters represents inhabited planets/systems. This doesn't jive with the detail in Historical: Reunification War about the Badlands Cluster having one inhabited world in the text, but a much higher number on maps, and I pointed this out, but... *shrugs* Most reasonable explanation is that in light of the new position, the drop in numbers represents worlds being abandoned/depopulated. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 08:57, 8 September 2014 (PDT) |
Revision as of 11:57, 8 September 2014
40 or 55?
Some maps show Brocchi's as having 40 systems in the cluster, while some maps (2750 until 2822) show it having 55. -Volt (talk) 02:54, 8 September 2014 (PDT)
- Think the 2750-2822 maps reflect the Catalyst position that the number for clusters represents inhabited planets/systems. This doesn't jive with the detail in Historical: Reunification War about the Badlands Cluster having one inhabited world in the text, but a much higher number on maps, and I pointed this out, but... *shrugs* Most reasonable explanation is that in light of the new position, the drop in numbers represents worlds being abandoned/depopulated. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 08:57, 8 September 2014 (PDT)