Talk:Demos (Bloodname)

Status Section

We need to reconsider the Status sections that mark a Bloodname as being dormant or minor. Multiple concerns:

• It appears to be specific to a particular era, and the Wiki covers all eras.
• It is not based on evidence, but rather lack of evidence. That puts it in the area of "speculation", which we strongly discourage.
• I chose this particular one because it leads off by implying that the name is not used, yet we have two properly-cited Bloodnamed holders, in two different Clans, well after the timeframe of the cited sources.

I seek consensus on removing these Status sections except where there is explicit evidence that a particular Bloodname was taken out of use at a particular time--Annihilation, a cited instance of Reaving, etc.--Talvin (talk) 19:01, 1 June 2022 (EDT)