Sarna News: Bad 'Mechs - Icestorm

Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Year sections"

(→‎What Sections?: excellent; color)
(added Wrangler's comments)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
:Good job, Ebakunin.[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 09:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 
:Good job, Ebakunin.[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 09:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 
:Just got on this morning, but it is far cleaner a code to use. If it hasn't been done already, I'll change the policy code to match.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 14:20, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 
:Just got on this morning, but it is far cleaner a code to use. If it hasn't been done already, I'll change the policy code to match.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 14:20, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
 +
:I don't think they should be used unless the year has more than couple events in each category, it just makes it cluttered if color templates are being used.  Example, Year [[2000]], only 1 thing happened, rest of it is subject headings.  It look cleaner without them.  If there whole number of events other related year topics, it would look better. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 11:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:29, 31 March 2010

What Sections?

Hey all. Here's the first draft of the year section template. You can see it in work here: 2103.

The template works like this:

{{year sections | battles }}

where the options are "battles", "events", "characters", and "technology". Anything else will create the template but with a white background and black border. I'm curious whether these are the categories and color schemes we want. Opinions? Thanks. --Ebakunin (talk|contribs) 04:52, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Simplified things. So it looks good. As for colors, the green seems a bit brighter that the rest, but it's nothing I would waste time on. --Neufeld 07:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
For the record, i changed it because the grey did not show on IE6 (yeah, some of us are stuck with that at work; you can tell, because my spelling errors increase.)--Revanche (talk|contribs) 14:20, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Good job, Ebakunin.Doneve 09:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Just got on this morning, but it is far cleaner a code to use. If it hasn't been done already, I'll change the policy code to match.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 14:20, 31 March 2010 (UTC)


I don't think they should be used unless the year has more than couple events in each category, it just makes it cluttered if color templates are being used. Example, Year 2000, only 1 thing happened, rest of it is subject headings. It look cleaner without them. If there whole number of events other related year topics, it would look better. -- Wrangler 11:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC)