Difference between revisions of "User talk:91.96.129.15"
Sarna News
(on Tex edits) |
m |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
That said, we ''could'' probably use an article on Tex Talks BattleTech or high-profile BattleTech YouTubers in general as notable fan works... -- [[User:Tumult&Travail|Tumult&Travail]] ([[User talk:Tumult&Travail|talk]]) 07:28, 6 December 2023 (EST) | That said, we ''could'' probably use an article on Tex Talks BattleTech or high-profile BattleTech YouTubers in general as notable fan works... -- [[User:Tumult&Travail|Tumult&Travail]] ([[User talk:Tumult&Travail|talk]]) 07:28, 6 December 2023 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Fine. I'll do it myself. *flexes BattleFist* [[User:T1MM5H|T1MM5H]] ([[User talk:T1MM5H|talk]]) 16:46, 6 December 2023 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:46, 6 December 2023
Tex/Van Zandt and Apocrypha[edit]
Hi. Always good to see a new contributor, but sadly, we've had to revert your recent edits. I'd like to quickly clarify why.
Canon lays out what we mean by canon, apocrypha, and non-canon. For something to be apocrypha, it has to be, while not included in the hard canon list, an official BattleTech thing - this is where the video games go, for instance. Tex Talks BattleTech is not official BattleTech material. Even if its an article about Tex's planet, we don't want canon material interspersed with pure fanon.
That said, we could probably use an article on Tex Talks BattleTech or high-profile BattleTech YouTubers in general as notable fan works... -- Tumult&Travail (talk) 07:28, 6 December 2023 (EST)
Fine. I'll do it myself. *flexes BattleFist* T1MM5H (talk) 16:46, 6 December 2023 (EST)