Editing Talk:List of BattleTech products
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision
Your text
Line 56:
Line 56:
::::[[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 17:06, 23 November 2010 (UTC) ::::[[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 17:06, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
− :::::*'''Category:BattleCorps Publications''':Not a bad idea at all (regarding catch-all articles). Why create an article for each mil-spec article? + :::::*'''Category:BattleCorps Publications''':Not a bad idea at all (regarding catch-all articles). Why create an article about an article?
:::::*'''Category:Short Stories & Comics''': IRT comics as a sub-cat, that sounds just right. :::::*'''Category:Short Stories & Comics''': IRT comics as a sub-cat, that sounds just right.
:::::*'''PDF vs. Print ''': Okay, hiatus on further discussion: agreed. I'm also up to re-examining the issue earlier, especially if the BC Exclusives takes off as consistently as the mainstream PDFs-only have. I'm just not as convinced that the lesser-sized membership of BC will warrant the same level of production, even for smaller products.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 18:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC) :::::*'''PDF vs. Print ''': Okay, hiatus on further discussion: agreed. I'm also up to re-examining the issue earlier, especially if the BC Exclusives takes off as consistently as the mainstream PDFs-only have. I'm just not as convinced that the lesser-sized membership of BC will warrant the same level of production, even for smaller products.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 18:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
::::[[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 17:06, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | ::::[[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 17:06, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
− | :::::*'''Category:BattleCorps Publications''':Not a bad idea at all (regarding catch-all articles). Why create an article | + | :::::*'''Category:BattleCorps Publications''':Not a bad idea at all (regarding catch-all articles). Why create an article about an article? |
:::::*'''Category:Short Stories & Comics''': IRT comics as a sub-cat, that sounds just right. | :::::*'''Category:Short Stories & Comics''': IRT comics as a sub-cat, that sounds just right. | ||
:::::*'''PDF vs. Print ''': Okay, hiatus on further discussion: agreed. I'm also up to re-examining the issue earlier, especially if the BC Exclusives takes off as consistently as the mainstream PDFs-only have. I'm just not as convinced that the lesser-sized membership of BC will warrant the same level of production, even for smaller products.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 18:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | :::::*'''PDF vs. Print ''': Okay, hiatus on further discussion: agreed. I'm also up to re-examining the issue earlier, especially if the BC Exclusives takes off as consistently as the mainstream PDFs-only have. I'm just not as convinced that the lesser-sized membership of BC will warrant the same level of production, even for smaller products.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 18:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC) |