Difference between revisions of "User talk:Mbear"

(Cruise Missile crisis ;))
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
On a more serious note, I am somewhat disappointed with myself over the "apocryphal" tags on the Objective Raids, Luthien, and 1st Ed. Periphery sourcebooks. I did notice them being added and knew it was wrong, but then it somehow dropped off my radar. Fixed now. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 04:18, 5 January 2013 (PST)
 
On a more serious note, I am somewhat disappointed with myself over the "apocryphal" tags on the Objective Raids, Luthien, and 1st Ed. Periphery sourcebooks. I did notice them being added and knew it was wrong, but then it somehow dropped off my radar. Fixed now. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 04:18, 5 January 2013 (PST)
 +
:It may be because you and I had a conversation over how the wording in the apocryphal template doesn't match the intent you had for it, after I argued that the wording on the apocryphal content template matched what Herb had said about the three books. [[User:BrokenMnemonic|BrokenMnemonic]] ([[User talk:BrokenMnemonic|talk]]) 10:52, 5 January 2013 (PST)

Revision as of 14:52, 5 January 2013

Something you want to say? Just let me know!

Archived

Cruise Missile 120

'nuff said. Consider yourself flogged and thoroughly publicly humiliated. :) Good Conduct Award, 1st ribbon

On a more serious note, I am somewhat disappointed with myself over the "apocryphal" tags on the Objective Raids, Luthien, and 1st Ed. Periphery sourcebooks. I did notice them being added and knew it was wrong, but then it somehow dropped off my radar. Fixed now. Frabby (talk) 04:18, 5 January 2013 (PST)

It may be because you and I had a conversation over how the wording in the apocryphal template doesn't match the intent you had for it, after I argued that the wording on the apocryphal content template matched what Herb had said about the three books. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 10:52, 5 January 2013 (PST)