Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Years"
(only BT) |
(delete it...off with its head) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I would say, only if these real-world-events have something to do with BattleTech. If we go further, the article-content would become arbitrary (and we are not wikipedia). --[[User:Detlef|Detlef]] 17:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC) | :I would say, only if these real-world-events have something to do with BattleTech. If we go further, the article-content would become arbitrary (and we are not wikipedia). --[[User:Detlef|Detlef]] 17:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::I was that lonely Editor who wrote that article, back in the early days of BTW. To be honest, I really don't think it is relevant, and for clarity's sake, suggest we delete it. As Detlef said, we are no WP and I think only real-world events that are referenced in the BattleTech lore should be included in the timeline. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 18:12, 3 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:12, 3 August 2009
BT History vs. Reality
The BattleTech timeline goes all the way back to the 21st century (2005). This causes a dilemma: should Years include events in the real world (1984)? What should be the policy? Thanks. --Ebakunin (talk|contribs) 15:55, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- I would say, only if these real-world-events have something to do with BattleTech. If we go further, the article-content would become arbitrary (and we are not wikipedia). --Detlef 17:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- I was that lonely Editor who wrote that article, back in the early days of BTW. To be honest, I really don't think it is relevant, and for clarity's sake, suggest we delete it. As Detlef said, we are no WP and I think only real-world events that are referenced in the BattleTech lore should be included in the timeline. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 18:12, 3 August 2009 (UTC)