Difference between revisions of "Talk:Corsair (moniker)"

m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==MW5 Codification==
 
==MW5 Codification==
 
The ''MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries'' fluff for the ''Corsair'' more specifically calls it a Oberon Confederation term, but MWO fluff does not makes that specific distinction.[[User:Cyc|Cyc]] ([[User talk:Cyc|talk]]) 05:15, 10 July 2021 (EDT)
 
The ''MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries'' fluff for the ''Corsair'' more specifically calls it a Oberon Confederation term, but MWO fluff does not makes that specific distinction.[[User:Cyc|Cyc]] ([[User talk:Cyc|talk]]) 05:15, 10 July 2021 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Canon Status of MWO Lore==
 +
 +
I don't think the lore for the apocryphal PGI Hero 'Mechs is salvageable as canon IMO, as the stories themselves are too tied up with the 'Mechs themselves. I think we'd have to say Ray's ruling overrides Randall's in respect of the apocryphal PGI Hero 'Mechs. [[User:HF22|HF22]] ([[User talk:HF22|talk]]) 05:52, 10 July 2021 (EDT)

Revision as of 05:52, 10 July 2021

MW5 Codification

The MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries fluff for the Corsair more specifically calls it a Oberon Confederation term, but MWO fluff does not makes that specific distinction.Cyc (talk) 05:15, 10 July 2021 (EDT)

Canon Status of MWO Lore

I don't think the lore for the apocryphal PGI Hero 'Mechs is salvageable as canon IMO, as the stories themselves are too tied up with the 'Mechs themselves. I think we'd have to say Ray's ruling overrides Randall's in respect of the apocryphal PGI Hero 'Mechs. HF22 (talk) 05:52, 10 July 2021 (EDT)