Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nueva Castile and the Umayyad Caliphate"
(Suggest deletion.) |
(agree) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:If nobody responds, I will split this article on Sunday. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 13:53, 30 April 2009 (PDT) | :If nobody responds, I will split this article on Sunday. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 13:53, 30 April 2009 (PDT) | ||
::I do agree with the split, but the disambiguation page is useless as it combines two unrelated topics into one. Like a disambiguation page "BattleMechs and AeroSpace fighters" routing you to either BattleMechs or Aerospace Fighters. I see no reason to keep it, especially since nothing links here. Suggest deletion. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 01:33, 5 May 2009 (PDT) | ::I do agree with the split, but the disambiguation page is useless as it combines two unrelated topics into one. Like a disambiguation page "BattleMechs and AeroSpace fighters" routing you to either BattleMechs or Aerospace Fighters. I see no reason to keep it, especially since nothing links here. Suggest deletion. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 01:33, 5 May 2009 (PDT) | ||
+ | :::I felt it would be fair to leave it up for a little while, just in case my action spurred discussion. I do agree, however, that it should be deleted. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 16:54, 5 May 2009 (PDT) |
Revision as of 19:54, 5 May 2009
This article is within the scope of the Project Factions, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of Factions. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
Split
I understand that these two nations are very closely linked together, but, since they are separate nations, shouldn't they each have their own article? --Scaletail 16:27, 23 April 2009 (PDT)
- If nobody responds, I will split this article on Sunday. --Scaletail 13:53, 30 April 2009 (PDT)
- I do agree with the split, but the disambiguation page is useless as it combines two unrelated topics into one. Like a disambiguation page "BattleMechs and AeroSpace fighters" routing you to either BattleMechs or Aerospace Fighters. I see no reason to keep it, especially since nothing links here. Suggest deletion. Frabby 01:33, 5 May 2009 (PDT)
- I felt it would be fair to leave it up for a little while, just in case my action spurred discussion. I do agree, however, that it should be deleted. --Scaletail 16:54, 5 May 2009 (PDT)
- I do agree with the split, but the disambiguation page is useless as it combines two unrelated topics into one. Like a disambiguation page "BattleMechs and AeroSpace fighters" routing you to either BattleMechs or Aerospace Fighters. I see no reason to keep it, especially since nothing links here. Suggest deletion. Frabby 01:33, 5 May 2009 (PDT)