Difference between revisions of "Template talk:External News"
Sarna News
(regarding today's news) |
(Suggest putting administrative news into the Minor News section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*Nic, the entry for today was really just an example, meant to help sell the idea to you. I figure you really should be the voice for this section. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] 20:28, 3 October 2006 (CDT) | *Nic, the entry for today was really just an example, meant to help sell the idea to you. I figure you really should be the voice for this section. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] 20:28, 3 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Minor news== | ||
| + | Although awareness may be low, we have a "Minor News" newsreel. It isn't used often and isn't even on the front page except as a link to the actual content. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I suggest we put both newsreels on the front page with the "Main" news reserved for big/important stuff regarding BattleTech and BTW at large, and the "Minor" news used for the frequent (and rather repetitive) administrative news, especially moratorium clearances. As it stands, I feel the administrative news tend to swamp down the "real" news. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 12:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 08:13, 19 January 2011
- Nic, the entry for today was really just an example, meant to help sell the idea to you. I figure you really should be the voice for this section. --Revanche 20:28, 3 October 2006 (CDT)
Minor news
Although awareness may be low, we have a "Minor News" newsreel. It isn't used often and isn't even on the front page except as a link to the actual content.
I suggest we put both newsreels on the front page with the "Main" news reserved for big/important stuff regarding BattleTech and BTW at large, and the "Minor" news used for the frequent (and rather repetitive) administrative news, especially moratorium clearances. As it stands, I feel the administrative news tend to swamp down the "real" news. Frabby 12:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC)