Difference between revisions of "User talk:Mbear/BVWorksheet"
Sarna News
(Feedback) |
m (Response.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
Good job so far! However I found some issues: | Good job so far! However I found some issues: | ||
* Errata not taken into account. [http://www.classicbattletech.com/index.php?action=text&page=TechManual TechManual Errata 2.0] | * Errata not taken into account. [http://www.classicbattletech.com/index.php?action=text&page=TechManual TechManual Errata 2.0] | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
* The HeatSinkRating part is confusing. What is 14? | * The HeatSinkRating part is confusing. What is 14? | ||
--[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 16:23, 19 April 2010 (UTC) | --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 16:23, 19 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :You're right about the errata. This is the first draft based on what I had in front of me. (The Tech Manual). | ||
| + | :Will add a disclaimer. | ||
| + | : Heat Sink Rating: the 14 is a made up number I needed for a placeholder. You may've missed it, but Total Armor Points and Total Internal Structure Points have 100 next to them for the same reason.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]] 17:02, 19 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:02, 19 April 2010
Good job so far! However I found some issues:
- Errata not taken into account. TechManual Errata 2.0
- Need a disclaimer/mentioning that TO stuff isn't in the worksheet.
- The HeatSinkRating part is confusing. What is 14?
--Neufeld 16:23, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- You're right about the errata. This is the first draft based on what I had in front of me. (The Tech Manual).
- Will add a disclaimer.
- Heat Sink Rating: the 14 is a made up number I needed for a placeholder. You may've missed it, but Total Armor Points and Total Internal Structure Points have 100 next to them for the same reason.--Mbear 17:02, 19 April 2010 (UTC)