Difference between revisions of "Talk:Peter Steiner-Davion"
m (resp) |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:Can we take out the line? Or at least, revise it subjectively? Right now, its very convoluted. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] | :Can we take out the line? Or at least, revise it subjectively? Right now, its very convoluted. [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::[[Policy:Bold|Be Bold]] - [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 11:52, 23 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:52, 23 February 2010
This article is within the scope of the Project Characters, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of Characters. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
Brotherhood of Cincinnatus: With respect, using an offhand line from an interview, even when uttered by a PTB, as basis for canon is in my opinion suspect at best. I feel that the only things stated as "fact" should be from published "in universe" material, such as a House Book or the new Hot Spots books.
MajorTom
Brought this up on the CBT boards and Roosterboy was able to come up with the actual, in-universe source: MWDA sourcebook Technology of Destruction. Will re-edit all three changed entries (Peter, Adam, and Lyran Alliance). My mistake, just want to make sure everything is accurate.
MajorTom
- Can we take out the line? Or at least, revise it subjectively? Right now, its very convoluted. ClanWolverine101