Difference between revisions of "BattleTechWiki talk:Combat Vehicle Portal"
Sarna News
(...why?) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I am proposing a portal of all vehicles armed with the Arrow IV. Is there disagreement to this? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 06:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC) | I am proposing a portal of all vehicles armed with the Arrow IV. Is there disagreement to this? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 06:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
: I would prefer one that includes both Arrow IV, Thumper, Sniper and Long Tom ones. Or at least if an Arrow IV category is made, then one for tube artillery is also made. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 08:20, 2 June 2010 (UTC) | : I would prefer one that includes both Arrow IV, Thumper, Sniper and Long Tom ones. Or at least if an Arrow IV category is made, then one for tube artillery is also made. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 08:20, 2 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :: Why is the "fire support combat vehicle" category insufficient? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 00:47, 3 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:47, 2 June 2010
Arrow IV Vehicles
I am proposing a portal of all vehicles armed with the Arrow IV. Is there disagreement to this? ClanWolverine101 06:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- I would prefer one that includes both Arrow IV, Thumper, Sniper and Long Tom ones. Or at least if an Arrow IV category is made, then one for tube artillery is also made. --Neufeld 08:20, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- Why is the "fire support combat vehicle" category insufficient? --Scaletail 00:47, 3 June 2010 (UTC)