Difference between revisions of "Category talk:100 ton BattleMechs"
(Huntress) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*I see your note about it not being a typo. What I can't figure out is why it doesn't show on the cat page as that. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche (admin)]] 15:32, 23 November 2006 (CST) | *I see your note about it not being a typo. What I can't figure out is why it doesn't show on the cat page as that. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche (admin)]] 15:32, 23 November 2006 (CST) | ||
:Because it ''always'' categorises the page with it's actual page name. The pipe in the category link merely tells it in what order to place it. I done it so that 100 comes after 95, instead of before 80. You'll notice I did something similar with [[{{ns:4}}:BTWProject]] as well. --[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] 16:21, 23 November 2006 (CST) | :Because it ''always'' categorises the page with it's actual page name. The pipe in the category link merely tells it in what order to place it. I done it so that 100 comes after 95, instead of before 80. You'll notice I did something similar with [[{{ns:4}}:BTWProject]] as well. --[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] 16:21, 23 November 2006 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == HNT-1S Huntress Battlemech == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Why is the Huntress Artillery mech not posted? The pictures and stats were printed in issue #14 of battle Technology? I have the article I just need to know how to upload it.--{{Unsigned|Vicktor Blueridge}} | ||
+ | : For one thing, its not considered canon at this point in time? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] ([[User talk:ClanWolverine101|talk]]) 23:01, 12 March 2014 (PDT) | ||
+ | :: No, that's not the reason. All BattleTechnology 'Mechs should get their own article, but at least half of them aren't covered yet. The reason is simply that nobody did the article yet; it's been on my to-do list for years. In that respect, my thanks go to Vicktor Blueridge! :) [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 00:01, 13 March 2014 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 03:01, 13 March 2014
96 ton[edit]
- I see your note about it not being a typo. What I can't figure out is why it doesn't show on the cat page as that. --Revanche (admin) 15:32, 23 November 2006 (CST)
- Because it always categorises the page with it's actual page name. The pipe in the category link merely tells it in what order to place it. I done it so that 100 comes after 95, instead of before 80. You'll notice I did something similar with BattleTechWiki:BTWProject as well. --Xoid 16:21, 23 November 2006 (CST)
HNT-1S Huntress Battlemech[edit]
Why is the Huntress Artillery mech not posted? The pictures and stats were printed in issue #14 of battle Technology? I have the article I just need to know how to upload it.--— The preceding unsigned comment was posted by Vicktor Blueridge (talk • contribs) .
- For one thing, its not considered canon at this point in time? ClanWolverine101 (talk) 23:01, 12 March 2014 (PDT)
- No, that's not the reason. All BattleTechnology 'Mechs should get their own article, but at least half of them aren't covered yet. The reason is simply that nobody did the article yet; it's been on my to-do list for years. In that respect, my thanks go to Vicktor Blueridge! :) Frabby (talk) 00:01, 13 March 2014 (PDT)