Difference between revisions of "Policy Talk:Blocking"

(resp)
(specifically)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
Really? It hasn't been worked on for some time. Was it rejected, or is it falsely flagged under construction? --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 09:14, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 
Really? It hasn't been worked on for some time. Was it rejected, or is it falsely flagged under construction? --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 09:14, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
  
:LOL. Well, I work on the policies as I have the time and inclination. Right now, [[:Template:Chatterweb|we have]] three other policy and two structure changes being discussed. And, I'm proud to say, I can't recall when the 3-revert rule was ever an issue here. However, because of your interest in the matter, I'll place it higher on the priority list. Its always good to have things done. Thanks for asking. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 11:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
+
:LOL. Well, I work on the policies as I have the time and inclination. Right now, [[:Template:Chatterweb|we have]] three other policy and two structure changes being discussed. However, because of your interest in the matter and because it has been an issue in the past (last summer, IIRC), I'll place it higher on the priority list. Its always good to have things done. Thanks for asking. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 11:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:45, 19 March 2010

"This policy is still under construction. Until it is completed, it has not become official. Feel free to take part in the development discussion."

Really? It hasn't been worked on for some time. Was it rejected, or is it falsely flagged under construction? --Neufeld 09:14, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

LOL. Well, I work on the policies as I have the time and inclination. Right now, we have three other policy and two structure changes being discussed. However, because of your interest in the matter and because it has been an issue in the past (last summer, IIRC), I'll place it higher on the priority list. Its always good to have things done. Thanks for asking. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 11:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)