Difference between revisions of "Talk:Apocalypse World Rover"

(Resp both questions.)
m (added {WikiProject Ground Units})
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{WikiProject Ground Units|tr=new}}
 +
 
==Cleanup==
 
==Cleanup==
 
This article needs complete and properly formatted sentences. It is very rough to read and while a well-formatted article, will detract from BTW's reputation as a reliable meta-source in its current form.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 21:00, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 
This article needs complete and properly formatted sentences. It is very rough to read and while a well-formatted article, will detract from BTW's reputation as a reliable meta-source in its current form.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 21:00, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:34, 18 September 2013

This article is within the scope of the Ground Units WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of non-BattleMech ground units. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

This article has been flagged for review by the Project: Ground Units team. If you have reviewed this article, please remove the tr parameter from this template.

Cleanup[edit]

This article needs complete and properly formatted sentences. It is very rough to read and while a well-formatted article, will detract from BTW's reputation as a reliable meta-source in its current form.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 21:00, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

I apologize, this was one my earlier attempts to write a vehicle profile. There isn't alot of information regarding it and no record sheets. I was stretching information as best i could. I have gone over the article fixed the grammer best i can. -- Wrangler 19:12, 28 April 2010 (UTC)


GM/Rowell[edit]

The link goes nowhere when GM has a page. Separate into two links, one for gm and one for rowell?

I've fixed the link. I am going go over the source book and try find the Rowell. I believe this was jointed venture or a civilian company/branch of GM. I've fixed the link to GM itself. I will trying find more on Rowell, but i don't have alot hope in it. -- Wrangler 19:12, 28 April 2010 (UTC)