Talk:Chilton (Jump Jets)

Phew... Who would have thunk that such an innocuous item as jump jets would involve so much legwork. This page is meant as a method of establishing a way to clean up the Jump Jets page. Each main type of Jump Jets could get a page modeled after this one and the type linked to the Jump Jets page in place of the large table there. -- -- LRichardson 08:28, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

I think this is a great idea. I'm glad someone thought of it. I was thinking I would make an equivalent for the Rawlings jump jets when I unfry my brain. I do have to wonder about all the pages named chilton x (where is is a number) Most of them have little in the way of content and if they did it would just duplicate what's here. Wouldn't it be better to just link straight here to the appropriate subsection and make those pages redirects? --BirdofPrey, 09:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Hy i jump in, i think we need no separated pages with minor conten like chilton x, redirects makes more sense, and we can take a deletion tag on the Chilton 460, 465 ect. pages, thanks.--Doneve 09:17, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

I was originally intending for them to be redirects but I could not figure out how to make them work. Alternatively the information about each of the sub models could be moved to those stubs to prevent this page from getting to0 big, bit I think that might be excessive. I mean, really, the particular number attached to the particular name of the jump jet used when there isn't even a named factory for that type of jump jet is about as fluffy of fluff as it gets. ; ) So, I personally think a redirect would be best. -- LRichardson 20:14, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Holla, i make the redirects in the next days, i bump out in this time the reference mess, on the Jump Jet page, and make some copyedits, on linked pages.--Doneve 20:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)