Difference between revisions of "Talk:Factions"
Sarna News
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* I've currently organized the Factions pages by putting links to both History (textual) and Timeline pages. Should these be in the immediate faction page, or separated as they are? [[User:Nicjansma|Nicjansma]] 02:35, 29 September 2006 (CDT) | * I've currently organized the Factions pages by putting links to both History (textual) and Timeline pages. Should these be in the immediate faction page, or separated as they are? [[User:Nicjansma|Nicjansma]] 02:35, 29 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
** First off, I want to preface my comment by saying I don't think there's anything wrong with having this page. However, if I understand the intent of the page correctly, its to act as an index (of sorts) for the factions. In my view, as each faction page is written/edited, it should have '''<nowiki>[[Category:CBT Factions]]</nowiki>''' added at the bottom, so that they'll be added to the CBT Factions category page. ''[And, in the re-design of the [[Main Page]] and toolbar, Categories should be listed somewhere appropriate. I'd love to have authority/access to that special page, to show you some ideas, as they come up.]'' As to your specific comments above: they should definitely be added to each faction article, if that faction has its own faction-specific timeline. BUT, there is nothing wrong in also including them here (as they are now). --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] 03:06, 29 September 2006 (CDT) | ** First off, I want to preface my comment by saying I don't think there's anything wrong with having this page. However, if I understand the intent of the page correctly, its to act as an index (of sorts) for the factions. In my view, as each faction page is written/edited, it should have '''<nowiki>[[Category:CBT Factions]]</nowiki>''' added at the bottom, so that they'll be added to the CBT Factions category page. ''[And, in the re-design of the [[Main Page]] and toolbar, Categories should be listed somewhere appropriate. I'd love to have authority/access to that special page, to show you some ideas, as they come up.]'' As to your specific comments above: they should definitely be added to each faction article, if that faction has its own faction-specific timeline. BUT, there is nothing wrong in also including them here (as they are now). --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] 03:06, 29 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Word of Blake?== | ||
| + | I'm not sure which they are, but the Word of Blake is listed as both a major and a minor faction. --[[User:Xoid|Xoid]] 01:50, 15 November 2006 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 03:50, 15 November 2006
Format of factions
- I've currently organized the Factions pages by putting links to both History (textual) and Timeline pages. Should these be in the immediate faction page, or separated as they are? Nicjansma 02:35, 29 September 2006 (CDT)
- First off, I want to preface my comment by saying I don't think there's anything wrong with having this page. However, if I understand the intent of the page correctly, its to act as an index (of sorts) for the factions. In my view, as each faction page is written/edited, it should have [[Category:CBT Factions]] added at the bottom, so that they'll be added to the CBT Factions category page. [And, in the re-design of the Main Page and toolbar, Categories should be listed somewhere appropriate. I'd love to have authority/access to that special page, to show you some ideas, as they come up.] As to your specific comments above: they should definitely be added to each faction article, if that faction has its own faction-specific timeline. BUT, there is nothing wrong in also including them here (as they are now). --Revanche 03:06, 29 September 2006 (CDT)
Word of Blake?
I'm not sure which they are, but the Word of Blake is listed as both a major and a minor faction. --Xoid 01:50, 15 November 2006 (CST)