Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ferro-Fibrous"
(ask Nic) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can someone tell me exactly why the title is so long and unhelpful? As far as I know, standard/ferro-fibrous armor can ''only'' be applied to BattleMechs and vehicles, since aerospace fighters use ferro-aluminum and spaceships ferro-carbide (not expecting anyone to actually look at the talk page). [[User:Cipher42|Cipher42]] 20:05, 10 July 2007 (CDT) | Can someone tell me exactly why the title is so long and unhelpful? As far as I know, standard/ferro-fibrous armor can ''only'' be applied to BattleMechs and vehicles, since aerospace fighters use ferro-aluminum and spaceships ferro-carbide (not expecting anyone to actually look at the talk page). [[User:Cipher42|Cipher42]] 20:05, 10 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Since Nic was the one who created the page, you would have to ask him. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 12:43, 11 July 2007 (CDT) | :Since Nic was the one who created the page, you would have to ask him. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 12:43, 11 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
+ | ::It looks like this was a goofy attempt at redirection -- I can't see any reason you'd want the title for the main article for a tech to not include the tech's name. [[Special:Contributions/71.199.233.118|71.199.233.118]] 04:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:09, 18 July 2009
Can someone tell me exactly why the title is so long and unhelpful? As far as I know, standard/ferro-fibrous armor can only be applied to BattleMechs and vehicles, since aerospace fighters use ferro-aluminum and spaceships ferro-carbide (not expecting anyone to actually look at the talk page). Cipher42 20:05, 10 July 2007 (CDT)
- Since Nic was the one who created the page, you would have to ask him. --Scaletail 12:43, 11 July 2007 (CDT)
- It looks like this was a goofy attempt at redirection -- I can't see any reason you'd want the title for the main article for a tech to not include the tech's name. 71.199.233.118 04:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC)