Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gallery Classicbattletech Companion"
Sarna News
(Created page with "==No more galleries?== I am not sure anymore, but was it not said, that every image must link to a relevant article and that there should be no more dedicated gallery pages? ...") |
Dirk Bastion (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I am not sure anymore, but was it not said, that every image must link to a relevant article and that there should be no more dedicated gallery pages? | I am not sure anymore, but was it not said, that every image must link to a relevant article and that there should be no more dedicated gallery pages? | ||
I do not want to discredit anyones work, I am just asking. [[User:Harry|Harry]] ([[User talk:Harry|talk]]) 07:32, 20 March 2013 (PDT) | I do not want to discredit anyones work, I am just asking. [[User:Harry|Harry]] ([[User talk:Harry|talk]]) 07:32, 20 March 2013 (PDT) | ||
| + | :Proper categorisation would make dedicated gallery articles superfluous - you could just go to the category itself, which would behave like one. Plus you can ferret out those images that aren't actually used. [[User:Dirk Bastion|Dirk Bastion]] ([[User talk:Dirk Bastion|talk]]) 08:33, 20 March 2013 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:33, 20 March 2013
No more galleries?
I am not sure anymore, but was it not said, that every image must link to a relevant article and that there should be no more dedicated gallery pages? I do not want to discredit anyones work, I am just asking. Harry (talk) 07:32, 20 March 2013 (PDT)
- Proper categorisation would make dedicated gallery articles superfluous - you could just go to the category itself, which would behave like one. Plus you can ferret out those images that aren't actually used. Dirk Bastion (talk) 08:33, 20 March 2013 (PDT)