Difference between revisions of "Talk:Principality of Regulus"

(There's some problems)
 
m (thanks for report)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
A new page was just made for the Principality of Regulus. Unfortunately the page is full of non canon material; it's talking about warships that never existed, that the Star League is around in late 3070, etc. I don't have the necessary source books to correct the page, should it be deleted wholesale or just left for someone who has the ability to correct it all?
 
A new page was just made for the Principality of Regulus. Unfortunately the page is full of non canon material; it's talking about warships that never existed, that the Star League is around in late 3070, etc. I don't have the necessary source books to correct the page, should it be deleted wholesale or just left for someone who has the ability to correct it all?
[[User:Desaints|Desaints]] ([[User talk:Desaints|talk]]) 20:51, 10 April 2013 (PDT)
+
[[User:Desaints|Desaints]] [[User talk:Desaints|talk]] 20:51, 10 April 2013 (PDT)
 +
:At first thanks for the talk, at second i don't had a good feeling when i read the page, thanks for involving, i think we don't delete the page but remove some non canon or plagiarizd info so fast as we can, thanks a lot.--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] ([[User talk:Doneve|talk]]) 21:23, 10 April 2013 (PDT)

Revision as of 00:23, 11 April 2013

A new page was just made for the Principality of Regulus. Unfortunately the page is full of non canon material; it's talking about warships that never existed, that the Star League is around in late 3070, etc. I don't have the necessary source books to correct the page, should it be deleted wholesale or just left for someone who has the ability to correct it all? Desaints talk 20:51, 10 April 2013 (PDT)

At first thanks for the talk, at second i don't had a good feeling when i read the page, thanks for involving, i think we don't delete the page but remove some non canon or plagiarizd info so fast as we can, thanks a lot.--Doneve (talk) 21:23, 10 April 2013 (PDT)