Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rommel"

(r)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
So I guess we're not going to note the widespread opinion that removing the Rommel tank from BattleTech is a dumb idea?
 
So I guess we're not going to note the widespread opinion that removing the Rommel tank from BattleTech is a dumb idea?
 
: I don't remember being asked for my opinion on whether I considered it a dumb idea. [[User:Madness Divine|Madness Divine]] ([[User talk:Madness Divine|talk]]) 21:14, 5 November 2022 (EDT)
 
: I don't remember being asked for my opinion on whether I considered it a dumb idea. [[User:Madness Divine|Madness Divine]] ([[User talk:Madness Divine|talk]]) 21:14, 5 November 2022 (EDT)
 +
: It's one of the original tanks from TRO 3025 and removing it "because nazis" smacks of idiocy.  Patton/Rommel were a historic rivalry from WWII and it makes perfect sense to have a pair of related tanks named after them. [[User:Lanzman|Lanzman]]

Revision as of 21:17, 5 November 2022

This article is within the scope of the Ground Units WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of non-BattleMech ground units. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

This article has been flagged for review by the Project: Ground Units team. If you have reviewed this article, please remove the tr parameter from this template.

So I guess we're not going to note the widespread opinion that removing the Rommel tank from BattleTech is a dumb idea?

I don't remember being asked for my opinion on whether I considered it a dumb idea. Madness Divine (talk) 21:14, 5 November 2022 (EDT)
It's one of the original tanks from TRO 3025 and removing it "because nazis" smacks of idiocy. Patton/Rommel were a historic rivalry from WWII and it makes perfect sense to have a pair of related tanks named after them. Lanzman

Retrieved from "https://www.sarna.net/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Rommel&oldid=899435"