Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Periphery"
Sarna News
(→1988 vs 1996: resp) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:Looks good. Although, so far most of the articles regarding sourcebooks on this Wiki use the naming scheme that puts "(sourcebook)" behind the title, to avoid a mixup with the article on whatever they are covering, i.e. ''The Periphery (sourcebook)''. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 02:20, 17 July 2008 (CDT) | :Looks good. Although, so far most of the articles regarding sourcebooks on this Wiki use the naming scheme that puts "(sourcebook)" behind the title, to avoid a mixup with the article on whatever they are covering, i.e. ''The Periphery (sourcebook)''. [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 02:20, 17 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::Good points, Cyc and Frabby (and good work, BigDuke...may I call you BigDuke?). Frabby, as unwieldy as it seems, I've added (sourcebook) to the titles. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 10:06, 17 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:06, 17 July 2008
1988 vs 1996
While going with the title on the book is the preference, slight problem with the fact there are two books with the same name released 8 years apart. Suggestion of move this to The Periphery (1988) and turn this into a disambig for
Cyc 20:18, 16 July 2008 (CDT)
Thanks for the idea.
Does the disambig look OK?
--BigDuke66 20:44, 16 July 2008 (CDT)
- Looks good. Although, so far most of the articles regarding sourcebooks on this Wiki use the naming scheme that puts "(sourcebook)" behind the title, to avoid a mixup with the article on whatever they are covering, i.e. The Periphery (sourcebook). Frabby 02:20, 17 July 2008 (CDT)