Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ulan Batar"
Sarna News
(Created page with '=Ownership= The ownership chart may be wrong, since First Prince Paul Davion ordered Ulan Batar siezed from the CapCon in defiance of a peace offer in 2808.~~~~') |
(question) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | =Ownership= | + | ==Ownership== |
The ownership chart may be wrong, since First Prince Paul Davion ordered Ulan Batar siezed from the CapCon in defiance of a peace offer in 2808.[[Special:Contributions/76.235.207.15|76.235.207.15]] 21:48, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | The ownership chart may be wrong, since First Prince Paul Davion ordered Ulan Batar siezed from the CapCon in defiance of a peace offer in 2808.[[Special:Contributions/76.235.207.15|76.235.207.15]] 21:48, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I found that note, too, for both '''Ulan Batar''' and [[Farwell]], pg. 61, [[The Periphery (sourcebook)]]. However, I would not jump to conclusions - the [[Federated Suns]] may have lost those worlds earlier in the [[1st Succession War]], and might simply be retaking lost worlds. Can anyone comment?--[[User:S.gage|S.gage]] 23:25, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:25, 18 September 2009
Ownership[edit]
The ownership chart may be wrong, since First Prince Paul Davion ordered Ulan Batar siezed from the CapCon in defiance of a peace offer in 2808.76.235.207.15 21:48, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- I found that note, too, for both Ulan Batar and Farwell, pg. 61, The Periphery (sourcebook). However, I would not jump to conclusions - the Federated Suns may have lost those worlds earlier in the 1st Succession War, and might simply be retaking lost worlds. Can anyone comment?--S.gage 23:25, 18 September 2009 (UTC)