Difference between revisions of "User talk:Revanche"
Sarna News
m (deleted duplicate) |
(resp) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I noticed that when you brought over the [[Classic BattleTech]] article, a lot of templates from Wikipedia came with it, which you subsequently removed from the article. Do you think we should keep them for future use, or simply delete them? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 20:54, 3 July 2008 (CDT) | I noticed that when you brought over the [[Classic BattleTech]] article, a lot of templates from Wikipedia came with it, which you subsequently removed from the article. Do you think we should keep them for future use, or simply delete them? --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 20:54, 3 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | :Sheer laziness on my part. I didn't have the time nor inclination to 'make' them work here. However, overall, I thought it worked for Wikipedia, so have no problems with it being here. Question is: with the matter for which those templates were built (i.e., wargames), do you see much need to spend the time building it here (for one...maybe a half-handful of articles)? --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 21:01, 3 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:01, 3 July 2008
Classic BattleTech templates
I noticed that when you brought over the Classic BattleTech article, a lot of templates from Wikipedia came with it, which you subsequently removed from the article. Do you think we should keep them for future use, or simply delete them? --Scaletail 20:54, 3 July 2008 (CDT)
- Sheer laziness on my part. I didn't have the time nor inclination to 'make' them work here. However, overall, I thought it worked for Wikipedia, so have no problems with it being here. Question is: with the matter for which those templates were built (i.e., wargames), do you see much need to spend the time building it here (for one...maybe a half-handful of articles)? --Revanche (talk|contribs) 21:01, 3 July 2008 (CDT)