User talk:WarDog Mike

Welcome

Welcome, WarDog Mike, to BattleTechWiki!

We look forward to your contributions and want to help you get off to a good strong start. Hopefully you will soon join the army of BattleTech Editors! If you need help formatting the pages, visit the manual of style. For general questions go to the Help section or the FAQ. If you can't find your answer there, please ask an Admin.

---

Additional tips
Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the wiki:

• For policies and guidelines, see The Five Core Policies of BattleTechWiki and the BTW Policies. Another good place to check out is our market of Projects, to see how the smaller communities within BTW do things in their particular niche areas.
• Each and every page (articles, policies, projects, images, etc.) has its very own discussion/talk page, found on the tab line at the top of the page. This is a great place to find out what the community is discussing along that subject and what previous issues have already been solved.
• If you want to play around with your new wiki skills, the Sandbox is for you. Don't worry: you won't break anything. A great resource for printing out is the Wiki Cheat Sheet.
• If you're not registered, then please consider doing so. At the very least, you'll have a UserPage that you own, rather than sharing one with the community.
• Also consider writing something about yourself on your UserPage (marked as "WarDog Mike" at the top of the page, though only do this if you're registered). You'll go from being a 'redshirt' to a 'blueshirt,' with the respect of a more permanent member.
  • This is really helpful for the admins, as it gives your account that touch of "humanity" that assists us in our never-ending battle with spambots.
• For your first few edits on the wiki, please do not add any URLs (which can be an indicator of SPAM).
• Consider introducing yourself on our Discord server.
• In your Preferences, under the edit tab, consider checking Add pages I create to my watchlist and Add pages I edit to my watchlist, so that you can see how your efforts have affected the community. Check back on following visits by clicking on watchlist.
• If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random button in the sidebar, or check out the List of Wanted Pages. Or even go to Special Pages to see what weird stuff is actually tracked by this wiki.
• Please sign your name on Talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the circled button in this image; this will automatically produce your name (or IP address, if you are editing anonymously) and the date.

Again, welcome to Sarna's BattleTechWiki!

*******Be Bold*******

-- New user message (talk) 02:33, 26 November 2015 (PST)

Hi

Hi and Hello, and welcome to Sarna! If you have any questions or wonder where to get started, feel free to leave a message on User talk:Doneve page, oh i moved your content from the Sandbox page to your own page. Hope to see you around!--Doneve (talk) 03:44, 26 November 2015 (PST)

Reformatting

Hiya WarDog Mike, I've taken the liberty to add some formatting to this page for readability while responding to your questions. hope you don't mind. Frabby (talk) 06:11, 28 November 2015 (PST)

    I have no issue at all.  I am completely new to this sort of thing so anything that you do to keep me clean and readable is fine with me.

Feedback: Great House articles

Alright...I kind of want to start by pointing out some issues I have with the site...(You said...Be Bold!!!) I am compiling information to create my own 3025 era sourcebook for my Battletech Campaign - A Time of War... The House Pages (i.e. House Kurita, and Davion, Steiner, Liao, and Marik respectively) DO NOT follow the same template...some have the sub heading called Fact Sheet...Marik or Liao does not have the reference at all, while Davion has more headings than Steiner, and much more than Kurita or the fourth house that actually has the heading.

I do not personally have the resources to correct these entries...but in all the editing you guys do...The first place new players will look is the factions pages... If they are not correct or complete, what does that say about the rest of the site? Thanks WarDog Mike

Thank you for your feedback. Seriously.
Sadly, all I can do at this point is to agree with you and request/suggest that once you have compiled your information you use it to give the articles a workover to improve them. I may look into editing those articles into a unified scheme myself at some point, but judging from what I have on my plate for this wiki alone, it won't be this year or next. Hopefully somebody else will take up the task. Frabby (talk) 06:11, 28 November 2015 (PST)

I remember that I tried to spearhead an effort to unify them a while back, but it ran out of steam and I got busy/distracted with other projects. You make a good point that it is somewhere that new players will look at first, which means it should have priority over the smaller, easier-to-complete projects that actually get done. I think that a thorough proofreading/rewriting should be done over the most important pages and then have consensus over how to re-organize them and possibly split them up. What does everyone think? -BobTheZombie (talk) 11:58, 29 November 2015 (PST)

Feedback: 3rd Succession War

I also use the entry for the 3rd Succession War as a start point for my players...Our current campaign will start in the year A.D. 3016 at the end of the 3rd Succession War at nagelring Academy on Tharkad... There is very little information concerning the battles or planets that exchanged hands during the war...I realize the War is 159 years long but most of the battle references seem to stop with the Deep Raid of 2987, with only a reference to the Archon's peace proposal to the Great Houses in 3020(or 3022, I am going from memory) Are the House Books not considered CANON for the timeline of the 3rd War? Thanks WarDog Mike

Sarna has articles for each individual year of BattleTech history, with notable events (hopefully) mentioned in those articles. The problem with timeline articles is the question of what level of detail it should entail. This is problematic for the Third Succession War in particular, as it is one of the most densely documented eras in the game with new content still added in on a regular basis. Any reasonably detailed timeline is bound to be one huge article. On the other hand, if only a broad overview is given then it may not be worth having such an article in the first place.
The old FASA House Books are canon, but over time many details turned out to be... wonky. Take information from these books with a grain of salt, as much of their content had to be corrected or clarified later on, not to mention some glaring omissions. Frabby (talk) 06:11, 28 November 2015 (PST)