Difference between revisions of "Talk:Heavy NPPC"
Sarna News
(→Naval PPC Category: re category tree) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Related Question, should the category be Naval PPC or NPPC?--[[User:PerkinsC|Cameron]] 15:01, 23 December 2010 (UTC) | Related Question, should the category be Naval PPC or NPPC?--[[User:PerkinsC|Cameron]] 15:01, 23 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
::The Naval PPC link was dead, I apolgoies for removing it. It would be Naval PPC though if you were to make category for it. The TacOps does not seperate them into weight/power categories (light/medium/Heavy), just Naval PPC for its tech fluff. Personally (not related to me removing category link) i think its redundant category. PPC categories covers all of them, have too many categories would be kinda of a slow down searching things out. Naval PPC article can keep them together for organization purposes. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 15:27, 23 December 2010 (UTC) | ::The Naval PPC link was dead, I apolgoies for removing it. It would be Naval PPC though if you were to make category for it. The TacOps does not seperate them into weight/power categories (light/medium/Heavy), just Naval PPC for its tech fluff. Personally (not related to me removing category link) i think its redundant category. PPC categories covers all of them, have too many categories would be kinda of a slow down searching things out. Naval PPC article can keep them together for organization purposes. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 15:27, 23 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::I redlink categories as a reminder to me to create a category or see where articles fall...--[[User:PerkinsC|Cameron]] 22:33, 23 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::As to subcategories, with the Naval PPC category being part of the Main PPC Category, then you would be able to open up the PPC category and then drill down to the Naval PPC article... or rather, my concept is being able to open up the technology category, click on the category link for weapons, then the category link for PPCs and finaly the catogory link for Naval PPCs... an alternate path passes through Warship Weapons and reaches Naval PPCs. Weapon articles woudl be reachable at any point in the tree that applies to them--[[User:PerkinsC|Cameron]] 22:33, 23 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:33, 23 December 2010
Wrangler, why did you remove the NPPC Category from the list of relevant categories for this article?--Cameron 15:01, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Related Question, should the category be Naval PPC or NPPC?--Cameron 15:01, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- The Naval PPC link was dead, I apolgoies for removing it. It would be Naval PPC though if you were to make category for it. The TacOps does not seperate them into weight/power categories (light/medium/Heavy), just Naval PPC for its tech fluff. Personally (not related to me removing category link) i think its redundant category. PPC categories covers all of them, have too many categories would be kinda of a slow down searching things out. Naval PPC article can keep them together for organization purposes. -- Wrangler 15:27, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- I redlink categories as a reminder to me to create a category or see where articles fall...--Cameron 22:33, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- As to subcategories, with the Naval PPC category being part of the Main PPC Category, then you would be able to open up the PPC category and then drill down to the Naval PPC article... or rather, my concept is being able to open up the technology category, click on the category link for weapons, then the category link for PPCs and finaly the catogory link for Naval PPCs... an alternate path passes through Warship Weapons and reaches Naval PPCs. Weapon articles woudl be reachable at any point in the tree that applies to them--Cameron 22:33, 23 December 2010 (UTC)