Difference between revisions of "BattleTechWiki:Awards"

(brainstorming)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
{{MAward1}}
 
{{MAward1}}
 
"Jim, I had no ide that putting a grasshopper into engines would stop it up. Thanks for helping me get it out. --[[User:Monty]]
 
"Jim, I had no ide that putting a grasshopper into engines would stop it up. Thanks for helping me get it out. --[[User:Monty]]
 +
 +
 +
==Awards Brainstorm==
 +
*Good Article: awarded for the creation of an article of considerable length and information, with very little or no need of editing or referencing (awarded generally only to a single author).
 +
*Superior Article: awarded for the creation of a superior article of considerable length and information, with no need of editing or referencing (may be jointly awarded when article is a work of collaboration).
 +
 +
 +
*edit count benchmarks: 100 (with up to 3 stars), 500 (with up to 4 stars), 3,000 (with up to 2 stars), and 10,000 (with up to 4 stars)

Revision as of 16:13, 2 June 2009

Award database

Template:Award1 "Jim...man, I can't believe you gave your grasshopper to my snake. really...thanks. --User:Leo


Template:Award2 "Jim, thanks for taking that grasshopper out of my hair. I appreciate it. --User:Pavel


Template:MAward1 "Jim, I had no ide that putting a grasshopper into engines would stop it up. Thanks for helping me get it out. --User:Monty


Awards Brainstorm

  • Good Article: awarded for the creation of an article of considerable length and information, with very little or no need of editing or referencing (awarded generally only to a single author).
  • Superior Article: awarded for the creation of a superior article of considerable length and information, with no need of editing or referencing (may be jointly awarded when article is a work of collaboration).


  • edit count benchmarks: 100 (with up to 3 stars), 500 (with up to 4 stars), 3,000 (with up to 2 stars), and 10,000 (with up to 4 stars)