Difference between revisions of "BattleTechWiki:Awards"
(brainstorming) |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{MAward1}} | {{MAward1}} | ||
"Jim, I had no ide that putting a grasshopper into engines would stop it up. Thanks for helping me get it out. --[[User:Monty]] | "Jim, I had no ide that putting a grasshopper into engines would stop it up. Thanks for helping me get it out. --[[User:Monty]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Awards Brainstorm== | ||
+ | *Good Article: awarded for the creation of an article of considerable length and information, with very little or no need of editing or referencing (awarded generally only to a single author). | ||
+ | *Superior Article: awarded for the creation of a superior article of considerable length and information, with no need of editing or referencing (may be jointly awarded when article is a work of collaboration). | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | *edit count benchmarks: 100 (with up to 3 stars), 500 (with up to 4 stars), 3,000 (with up to 2 stars), and 10,000 (with up to 4 stars) |
Revision as of 16:13, 2 June 2009
Award database
Template:Award1 "Jim...man, I can't believe you gave your grasshopper to my snake. really...thanks. --User:Leo
Template:Award2 "Jim, thanks for taking that grasshopper out of my hair. I appreciate it. --User:Pavel
Template:MAward1 "Jim, I had no ide that putting a grasshopper into engines would stop it up. Thanks for helping me get it out. --User:Monty
Awards Brainstorm
- Good Article: awarded for the creation of an article of considerable length and information, with very little or no need of editing or referencing (awarded generally only to a single author).
- Superior Article: awarded for the creation of a superior article of considerable length and information, with no need of editing or referencing (may be jointly awarded when article is a work of collaboration).
- edit count benchmarks: 100 (with up to 3 stars), 500 (with up to 4 stars), 3,000 (with up to 2 stars), and 10,000 (with up to 4 stars)