Difference between revisions of "Category talk:C3 Slave Equipped Combat Vehicles"
Tosta Dojen (talk | contribs) (Tag the articles, or delete the category?) |
(concur) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Improper category formatting== | ||
This doesn't seem like the right way to format a category page. I don't know enough about the subject to suggest whether we should add the category tag to the appropriate vehicle articles, or just delete the category entirely. [[User:Tosta Dojen|Tosta Dojen]] ([[User talk:Tosta Dojen|talk]]) 15:25, 3 October 2020 (EDT) | This doesn't seem like the right way to format a category page. I don't know enough about the subject to suggest whether we should add the category tag to the appropriate vehicle articles, or just delete the category entirely. [[User:Tosta Dojen|Tosta Dojen]] ([[User talk:Tosta Dojen|talk]]) 15:25, 3 October 2020 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : '''Concur'''. I removed the non-categorized list of vehicles. They'll return in the future, if they are C3 slave-equipped vehicles and through proper article categorizing. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 11:29, 7 June 2022 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 11:29, 7 June 2022
Improper category formatting[edit]
This doesn't seem like the right way to format a category page. I don't know enough about the subject to suggest whether we should add the category tag to the appropriate vehicle articles, or just delete the category entirely. Tosta Dojen (talk) 15:25, 3 October 2020 (EDT)