Difference between revisions of "Category talk:C3 Slave Equipped Combat Vehicles"

(Tag the articles, or delete the category?)
 
(concur)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
 +
==Improper category formatting==
 
This doesn't seem like the right way to format a category page. I don't know enough about the subject to suggest whether we should add the category tag to the appropriate vehicle articles, or just delete the category entirely. [[User:Tosta Dojen|Tosta Dojen]] ([[User talk:Tosta Dojen|talk]]) 15:25, 3 October 2020 (EDT)
 
This doesn't seem like the right way to format a category page. I don't know enough about the subject to suggest whether we should add the category tag to the appropriate vehicle articles, or just delete the category entirely. [[User:Tosta Dojen|Tosta Dojen]] ([[User talk:Tosta Dojen|talk]]) 15:25, 3 October 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
: '''Concur'''. I removed the non-categorized list of vehicles. They'll return in the future, if they are C3 slave-equipped vehicles and through proper article categorizing. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 11:29, 7 June 2022 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 11:29, 7 June 2022

Improper category formatting[edit]

This doesn't seem like the right way to format a category page. I don't know enough about the subject to suggest whether we should add the category tag to the appropriate vehicle articles, or just delete the category entirely. Tosta Dojen (talk) 15:25, 3 October 2020 (EDT)

Concur. I removed the non-categorized list of vehicles. They'll return in the future, if they are C3 slave-equipped vehicles and through proper article categorizing. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 11:29, 7 June 2022 (EDT)