User contributions
- 13:40, 12 October 2019 diff hist +2 m Star Lord (JumpShip class) →Cargo
- 13:39, 12 October 2019 diff hist +2 Monolith →Cargo
- 13:39, 12 October 2019 diff hist +2 m Monolith →Variants and other apocryphal errors
- 13:38, 12 October 2019 diff hist +4 m Monolith →Cargo
- 13:31, 12 October 2019 diff hist -5 m Monolith →Variants and other apocryphal errors
- 13:31, 12 October 2019 diff hist +182 Monolith →Variants and other apocryphal errors
- 13:29, 12 October 2019 diff hist +2 m Star Lord (JumpShip class) →Cargo
- 13:27, 12 October 2019 diff hist +4 m Monolith →Cargo
- 13:27, 12 October 2019 diff hist +28 Monolith →Variants: Again, these altered versions aren't variants, they are errors.
- 13:24, 12 October 2019 diff hist +483 Monolith →Cargo: Like the other "original" jumpships, the cargo numbers are just incorrect.
- 13:15, 12 October 2019 diff hist +66 Star Lord (JumpShip class) →Armament
- 13:12, 12 October 2019 diff hist +10 m Star Lord (JumpShip class) →Variants and Apocryphal Errors
- 13:08, 12 October 2019 diff hist -1 Star Lord (JumpShip class) →Variants: These are not "variants," they are full-out errors.
- 13:03, 12 October 2019 diff hist +1 m Star Lord (JumpShip class) →Cargo
- 13:02, 12 October 2019 diff hist +324 Star Lord (JumpShip class) →Cargo: The "661 tons of cargo" figure is derived from obsolete, and incorrect, source text.
- 12:27, 12 October 2019 diff hist +315 Invader →Cargo: Cargo listing is, of course, based on the old, incorrect information. As equipped, the Invader would have to be much, much larger to support 500+ tons of cargo.
- 12:15, 12 October 2019 diff hist +143 Feng Huang →Description: The Feng Huang is a deeply flawed warship; claims of its efficacy are surely intentional exaggeration on the part of the CCAF
- 12:05, 12 October 2019 diff hist +99 User talk:Cavgunner
- 12:04, 12 October 2019 diff hist +15 Union (DropShip class) →Description: Not sure "stalwart" was really the right connotation in this context
- 12:02, 12 October 2019 diff hist -34 Union (DropShip class) →Armament: Adjusted the wording of the final sentence
- 11:46, 12 October 2019 diff hist 0 Manticore →Description
- 11:42, 12 October 2019 diff hist +221 User talk:Cavgunner
- 20:41, 11 October 2019 diff hist +173 User talk:Cavgunner
- 20:23, 11 October 2019 diff hist -87 Vali →Weapons and Equipment: The amount of time that the Vali can sustain fire is self-evident.
- 20:22, 11 October 2019 diff hist -21 Vali →Description: "mainstay" is one word. Cleanup of poor syntax
- 20:12, 11 October 2019 diff hist -51 Darter →Weapons and Equipment: The reader can determine for him or herself if a full ton of ammunition is overly generous.
- 14:39, 10 October 2019 diff hist -1 Greenburg's Godzillas →History: No apostrophe needed ya putz
- 17:23, 9 October 2019 diff hist -11 Gaajian →Weapons and Equipment: Removed unnecessary bolding
- 17:20, 9 October 2019 diff hist +2 Hi-Scout →Drones: Corrected punctuation, removed unneccessary bolding.
- 16:30, 15 January 2018 diff hist -3 m Gaajian →Description
- 23:04, 14 January 2018 diff hist +378 Talk:Gaajian
- 23:02, 14 January 2018 diff hist +15 m Gaajian →Description
- 22:59, 14 January 2018 diff hist +8 m Gaajian →Variants
- 22:58, 14 January 2018 diff hist +4 m Gaajian →Weapons and Equipment
- 22:57, 14 January 2018 diff hist 0 m Gaajian →Weapons and Equipment: More spelling edits... yeesh. Complement, not "compliment"
- 22:56, 14 January 2018 diff hist +4 Gaajian →Weapons and Equipment
- 22:56, 14 January 2018 diff hist +5 m Gaajian More syntax corrections
- 22:55, 14 January 2018 diff hist -11 m Gaajian Corrected a variety of sloppy spelling and syntax errors.