Difference between revisions of "Talk:52nd Shadow Division"

(agree, Ragtag)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
::Thank you, Ragtag. And, 76.191.206.51, BTW improves when people actually make ''improvements'' to the article. Sardonic comments in the summary line could do harm, ''if'' our quality of Editors were affected by them. Looking forward to ''your'' use of grammar or diction skills in a positive way.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 11:31, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 
::Thank you, Ragtag. And, 76.191.206.51, BTW improves when people actually make ''improvements'' to the article. Sardonic comments in the summary line could do harm, ''if'' our quality of Editors were affected by them. Looking forward to ''your'' use of grammar or diction skills in a positive way.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 11:31, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
My bad, but I don't really consider saying that grammar needs improvement to be an insult. No harm was intended. I went ahead and updated the page myself, and I'll try to be more accommodating in the future.

Revision as of 00:55, 25 March 2010

This page needs heavy work in the category of grammar and diction.— The preceding unsigned comment was posted by 76.191.206.51 (talkcontribs) 05:05, 24 March 2010 .

like many other pages, no need to throw insults around randomly!RagTag 10:42, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you, Ragtag. And, 76.191.206.51, BTW improves when people actually make improvements to the article. Sardonic comments in the summary line could do harm, if our quality of Editors were affected by them. Looking forward to your use of grammar or diction skills in a positive way.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 11:31, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

My bad, but I don't really consider saying that grammar needs improvement to be an insult. No harm was intended. I went ahead and updated the page myself, and I'll try to be more accommodating in the future.