Difference between revisions of "Talk:DropShip"
Sarna News
(See Also?) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
While I do like the brief rundown of DropShip classes at the end of the article, I have been thinking if it would not be better to redirect the whole article to the Category:DropShips in a similar fashion as it was done with Mercenaries. Having both the article and the category is sort of pointless, and putting the article into the category (the only way to link the category from the article that I know of) is awkward. Opinions? [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 05:44, 22 September 2007 (CDT) | While I do like the brief rundown of DropShip classes at the end of the article, I have been thinking if it would not be better to redirect the whole article to the Category:DropShips in a similar fashion as it was done with Mercenaries. Having both the article and the category is sort of pointless, and putting the article into the category (the only way to link the category from the article that I know of) is awkward. Opinions? [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 05:44, 22 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :How about a "See Also" section that would send the reader to [[:Category:DropShips]]? [[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 14:04, 25 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:04, 25 September 2007
While I do like the brief rundown of DropShip classes at the end of the article, I have been thinking if it would not be better to redirect the whole article to the Category:DropShips in a similar fashion as it was done with Mercenaries. Having both the article and the category is sort of pointless, and putting the article into the category (the only way to link the category from the article that I know of) is awkward. Opinions? Frabby 05:44, 22 September 2007 (CDT)
- How about a "See Also" section that would send the reader to Category:DropShips? Scaletail 14:04, 25 September 2007 (CDT)