Difference between revisions of "Talk:Patton"
Sarna News
(resp: MBT.) |
(→CQB?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Just a little thought at CloseQuarterBattles.... If the Rommel is a CloseCombatVehicle, isn't the Patton something else? Yes, the AC/10 isn't exactly a far-reaching weapon by modern standards, but it certainly is not a specialized CCWeapon such as its larger cousin! I'd vote for revision, but this category-stuff is hard to resolve... Just gimme your thoughts on that if you have any...; )[[User:RagTag|RagTag]] 18:28, 11 April 2010 (UTC) | Just a little thought at CloseQuarterBattles.... If the Rommel is a CloseCombatVehicle, isn't the Patton something else? Yes, the AC/10 isn't exactly a far-reaching weapon by modern standards, but it certainly is not a specialized CCWeapon such as its larger cousin! I'd vote for revision, but this category-stuff is hard to resolve... Just gimme your thoughts on that if you have any...; )[[User:RagTag|RagTag]] 18:28, 11 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
: I would say MBT-Main Battle Tank. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 18:34, 11 April 2010 (UTC) | : I would say MBT-Main Battle Tank. --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 18:34, 11 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Just what I wanted to say after checking the MBT-category.... :D[[User:RagTag|RagTag]] 18:36, 11 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:36, 11 April 2010
CQB?
Just a little thought at CloseQuarterBattles.... If the Rommel is a CloseCombatVehicle, isn't the Patton something else? Yes, the AC/10 isn't exactly a far-reaching weapon by modern standards, but it certainly is not a specialized CCWeapon such as its larger cousin! I'd vote for revision, but this category-stuff is hard to resolve... Just gimme your thoughts on that if you have any...; )RagTag 18:28, 11 April 2010 (UTC)