Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rommel"
(r) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: I don't remember being asked for my opinion on whether I considered it a dumb idea. [[User:Madness Divine|Madness Divine]] ([[User talk:Madness Divine|talk]]) 21:14, 5 November 2022 (EDT) | : I don't remember being asked for my opinion on whether I considered it a dumb idea. [[User:Madness Divine|Madness Divine]] ([[User talk:Madness Divine|talk]]) 21:14, 5 November 2022 (EDT) | ||
: It's one of the original tanks from TRO 3025 and removing it "because nazis" smacks of idiocy. Patton/Rommel were a historic rivalry from WWII and it makes perfect sense to have a pair of related tanks named after them. [[User:Lanzman|Lanzman]] | : It's one of the original tanks from TRO 3025 and removing it "because nazis" smacks of idiocy. Patton/Rommel were a historic rivalry from WWII and it makes perfect sense to have a pair of related tanks named after them. [[User:Lanzman|Lanzman]] | ||
+ | :: The point is that '''you''' don't decide what opinion is widespread. | ||
+ | :: Regardless of one's opinion, grousing about it doesn't belong in any article on the wiki. [[User:Madness Divine|Madness Divine]] ([[User talk:Madness Divine|talk]]) 01:08, 6 November 2022 (EDT) |
Revision as of 01:09, 6 November 2022
So I guess we're not going to note the widespread opinion that removing the Rommel tank from BattleTech is a dumb idea?
- I don't remember being asked for my opinion on whether I considered it a dumb idea. Madness Divine (talk) 21:14, 5 November 2022 (EDT)
- It's one of the original tanks from TRO 3025 and removing it "because nazis" smacks of idiocy. Patton/Rommel were a historic rivalry from WWII and it makes perfect sense to have a pair of related tanks named after them. Lanzman
- The point is that you don't decide what opinion is widespread.
- Regardless of one's opinion, grousing about it doesn't belong in any article on the wiki. Madness Divine (talk) 01:08, 6 November 2022 (EDT)